Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Banking and Finance (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Economics (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- (Quasi) Monopoly (1)
-
- Antitrust (1)
- China (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Controlling Minority Structure (CMS) (1)
- Controlling Shareholder (1)
- Deadweight Loss (1)
- Empirical analysis (1)
- Finance (1)
- Investor Protection (1)
- Investor protection (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Law and finance (1)
- Monopoly Profits (Rents) (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Securities law (1)
- Securities regulation (1)
- Shareholder Primacy (1)
- Shareholder Wealth Maximization (1)
- State-owned Enterprise (SOE) (1)
- Stock Options (1)
- Tax law reform (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Taxation-Federal Income (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Puzzles In Controlling Shareholder Regimes And China: Shareholder Primacy And (Quasi) Monopoly, Sang Yop Kang
Puzzles In Controlling Shareholder Regimes And China: Shareholder Primacy And (Quasi) Monopoly, Sang Yop Kang
Sang Yop Kang
Professor Mark Roe explained that the shareholder wealth maximization norm (“the norm”) is not fit for a country with a (quasi) monopoly, because the norm encourages managers to maximize monopoly rents, to the detriment of the national economy. This Article provides new findings and counter-intuitive arguments as to the tension created by the norm and (quasi) monopoly by exploring three key corporate governance concepts that Roe did not examine—(1) “controlling minority structure” (CMS), where dominant shareholders hold a fractional ownership in their controlled-corporations, (2) “tunneling” (i.e., illicit transfer of corporate wealth to controlling shareholders), and (3) Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). …
The Moral Undercurrent Beneath The Regulatory Regime Of Investor Protection, Huhnkie Lee
The Moral Undercurrent Beneath The Regulatory Regime Of Investor Protection, Huhnkie Lee
Huhnkie Lee
No abstract provided.
Law In Regression? Impacts Of Quantitative Research On Law And Regulation, David C. Donald
Law In Regression? Impacts Of Quantitative Research On Law And Regulation, David C. Donald
David C. Donald
Quantitative research (QR) has undeniably improved the quality of law- and rulemaking, but it can also present risks for these activities. On the one hand, replacing anecdotal assertions regarding behavior or the effects of rules in an area to be regulated with objective, statistical evidence has advanced the quality of regulatory discourse. On the other hand, because the construction of such evidence often depends on bringing the complex realities of both human behavior and rules designed to govern it into simple, quantified variables, QR findings can at times camouflage complexity, masking real problems. Deceptively objective findings can in this way …