Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Banking (1)
- Competence (1)
- Digital investment advice (1)
- Dirks v. SEC (1)
- FINRA (1)
-
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (1)
- Financial product intermediary regulation (1)
- Financial technology (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Honesty (1)
- Insider trading (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Judicial lawmaking (1)
- Martoma (1)
- Material nonpublic information (1)
- Robo adviser (1)
- Robo advisers (1)
- Robo-advisor (1)
- Robo-advisors (1)
- Roboadvisor (1)
- Roboadvisors (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Salman (1)
- Securities (1)
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur (1)
- Securities regulation (1)
- Suitability (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Regulating Robo Advice Across The Financial Services Industry, Tom Baker, Benedict G. C. Dellaert
Regulating Robo Advice Across The Financial Services Industry, Tom Baker, Benedict G. C. Dellaert
All Faculty Scholarship
Automated financial product advisors – “robo advisors” – are emerging across the financial services industry, helping consumers choose investments, banking products, and insurance policies. Robo advisors have the potential to lower the cost and increase the quality and transparency of financial advice for consumers. But they also pose significant new challenges for regulators who are accustomed to assessing human intermediaries. A well-designed robo advisor will be honest and competent, and it will recommend only suitable products. Because humans design and implement robo advisors, however, honesty, competence, and suitability cannot simply be assumed. Moreover, robo advisors pose new scale risks that …
Constructive Ambiguity And Judicial Development Of Insider Trading, Jill E. Fisch
Constructive Ambiguity And Judicial Development Of Insider Trading, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
The Texas Gulf Sulphur decision began what has become a fifty-year project of developing U.S. insider trading regulation through judicial lawmaking. During the course of that project, the courts developed a complex, fraud-based approach to determining the scope of liability. The approach has led, in many cases, to doctrinal uncertainty, a result that is reflected in the recent decisions in Newman, Salman, and Martoma.
n the face of this uncertainty, many commentators have called for a legislative solution. This article argues, however, that the true challenge of insider trading regulation is a lack of consensus about the …