Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Corporate governance (2)
- Securities (2)
- Access to the ballot (1)
- Benefits and dangers of picking shareholders (1)
- Boards (1)
-
- Corporate ballot (1)
- Corporate elections (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Crafting the shareholder base in public corporations (1)
- Directors (1)
- Financial products (1)
- Floating NAV (1)
- Good shareholders v. bad shareholders (1)
- Investor relations (1)
- Management control over ownership (1)
- Money market funds (1)
- Mutual funds (1)
- Preference for certain shareholders (1)
- Proxy contests (1)
- Proxy fights (1)
- Proxy rules (1)
- Recruitment (1)
- SEC (1)
- Shaping the shareholder base as part of corporate governance (1)
- Shareholder franchise (1)
- Shareholder relations (1)
- Shareholder rights (1)
- Shareholder voting (1)
- Shareholders (1)
- Staggered boards (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Shareholder Eugenics In The Public Corporation, Edward B. Rock
Shareholder Eugenics In The Public Corporation, Edward B. Rock
All Faculty Scholarship
In a world of active, empowered shareholders, the match between shareholders and public corporations can potentially affect firm value. This article examines the extent to which publicly held corporations can shape their shareholder base. Two sorts of approaches are available: direct/recruitment strategies; and shaping or socialization strategies. Direct/recruitment strategies through which “good” shareholders are attracted to the firm include: going public; targeted placement of shares; traditional investor relations; the exploitation of clientele effects; and de-recruitment. “Shaping” or “socialization” strategies in which shareholders of a “bad” or unknown type are transformed into shareholders of the “good” type include: choice of domicile; …
The Destructive Ambiguity Of Federal Proxy Access, Jill E. Fisch
The Destructive Ambiguity Of Federal Proxy Access, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
After almost seventy years of debate, on August 25, 2010, the SEC adopted a federal proxy access rule. This Article examines the new rule and concludes that, despite the prolonged rule-making effort, the new rule is ambiguous in its application and unlikely to increase shareholder input into the composition of corporate boards. More troubling is the SEC’s ambiguous justification for its rule which is neither grounded in state law nor premised on a normative vision of the appropriate role of shareholder nominations in corporate governance. Although the federal proxy access rule drew an unprecedented number of comment letters and is …
A Floating Nav For Money Market Funds: Fix Or Fantasy?, Jill E. Fisch, Eric D. Roiter
A Floating Nav For Money Market Funds: Fix Or Fantasy?, Jill E. Fisch, Eric D. Roiter
All Faculty Scholarship
The announcement by the Reserve Primary Fund, in September 2008, that it was “breaking the buck,” triggered a widespread withdrawal of assets from other money market funds and led the U.S. Government to adopt emergency measures to maintain the stability of the short term credit markets. In light of these events, the SEC heightened the regulatory requirements to which money market funds – a three trillion dollar industry -- are subject. Regulators and commentators continue to press for further regulatory change, however. The most controversial reform proposal would eliminate the ability of money market funds to purchase and sell shares …