Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (27)
- Selected Works (17)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (9)
- SelectedWorks (9)
-
- Santa Clara Law (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Science and Technology (11)
- Law and Technology (8)
- Computer Law (7)
- Intellectual property (7)
-
- Patents (5)
- Biotechnology (4)
- Patent (4)
- Arts and Entertainment (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Copyright infringement (3)
- Copyright law (3)
- Infringement (3)
- International Law (3)
- Internet (3)
- Liability (3)
- Property-Personal and Real (3)
- Technology (3)
- China (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Consumers (2)
- Copyright (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Cybersecurity (2)
- Digital technology (2)
- Economics (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- FRAND (2)
- Fair use (2)
- Genetics (2)
- Publication
-
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (27)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (9)
- IP Theory (9)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (7)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (5)
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Articles (3)
- David E. Sorkin (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Daryl Lim (2)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (2)
- Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Peter K. Yu (2)
- Rob Frieden (2)
- Seattle Journal of Environmental Law (2)
- William K. Ford (2)
- Andrew Leahey (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Christopher McElwain (1)
- Constance E. Bagley (1)
- Dana Beldiman (1)
- Edward Lee (1)
- Emily Michiko Morris (1)
- Events (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- John Evans (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 112
Full-Text Articles in Science and Technology Law
Table Of Contents
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Oracle America, Inc. V. Google, Inc.,750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014), Cert. Denied: Ideas, Methods, And Expression - Whose Innovation Is Protected?, Christopher J. Geissler
Oracle America, Inc. V. Google, Inc.,750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014), Cert. Denied: Ideas, Methods, And Expression - Whose Innovation Is Protected?, Christopher J. Geissler
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act Of 2015, S. 1890, H.R. 3326, 114th Congress (2015), Joseph K.C. Doukmetzian
The Defend Trade Secrets Act Of 2015, S. 1890, H.R. 3326, 114th Congress (2015), Joseph K.C. Doukmetzian
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Implications For The Future Of Global Data Security And Privacy: The Territorial Application Of The Stored Communications Act And The Microsoft Case, Russell Hsiao
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
The Dmca Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail Or Safe?, Maryna Koberidze
The Dmca Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail Or Safe?, Maryna Koberidze
Maryna Koberidze
Direct Digital Engagement Of Patients And Democratizing Health Care, Dov Greenbaum
Direct Digital Engagement Of Patients And Democratizing Health Care, Dov Greenbaum
Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal
Direct Digital Engagement of Patients and Democratizing Health Care
Design Patent Evolution: From Obscurity To Center Stage, Andrew Beckerman-Rodau
Design Patent Evolution: From Obscurity To Center Stage, Andrew Beckerman-Rodau
Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal
Design Patient Evolution: From Obscurity to Center Stage
Only A Pawn In The Game: Rethinking Induced Patent Infringement, W. Keith Robinson
Only A Pawn In The Game: Rethinking Induced Patent Infringement, W. Keith Robinson
Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal
Only a Pawn in the Game: Rethinking Induced Patent Infringement
The Cost Of Confusion: The Paradox Of Trademarked Pharmaceuticals, Hannah Brennan
The Cost Of Confusion: The Paradox Of Trademarked Pharmaceuticals, Hannah Brennan
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The United States spends nearly $1,000 per person annually on drugs—forty percent more than the next highest spender, Canada, and more than twice the amount France and Germany spend. Although myriad factors contribute to high drug spending in the United States, intellectual property law plays a crucial and well-documented role in inhibiting access to cheaper, generic medications. Yet, for the most part, the discussion of the relationship between intellectual property law and drug spending has centered on patent protection. Recently, however, a few researchers have turned their attention to a different avenue of exclusivity—trademark law. New studies suggest that pharmaceutical …
The Ftc Has A Dog In The Patent Monopoly Fight: Will Antitrust’S Bite Kill Generic Challenges?, Jennifer D. Cieluch
The Ftc Has A Dog In The Patent Monopoly Fight: Will Antitrust’S Bite Kill Generic Challenges?, Jennifer D. Cieluch
Duke Law & Technology Review
Antitrust laws have been notoriously lenient in the patent realm, the underlying reason being that patents’ grant of exclusion create monopolies that defy antitrust laws in order to incentivize innovation. Thus, antitrust violations have rarely been found in the patent cases. But after the Supreme Court’s holding in FTC v. Actavis, brand name pharmaceutical companies may need to be more cautious when settling Hatch-Waxman litigation with potential patent infringers. Both brand-name drug manufacturers and generic drug manufacturers have incentives to settle cases by having the brand-name pay the generic in exchange for delaying their entry into the market. While courts …
Avoiding The Next Napster: Copyright Infringement And Investor Liability In The Age Of User Generated Content, Truan Savage
Avoiding The Next Napster: Copyright Infringement And Investor Liability In The Age Of User Generated Content, Truan Savage
Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review
Rapid developments in digital technology over the past quarter century have made it easier than ever for people to create and instantly share content. These developments have served as the basis for countless innovations and have spawned some of today’s largest and most profitable companies. As content creation and distribution continues to evolve, businesses seek new ways to profit from these technological innovations. But while businesses continue to develop around new methods of content distribution, the law of copyright, which generally aims to encourage the creation of content, has been slow to adapt. This era of modern technological innovation thus …
Diagnostics Need Not Apply, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Diagnostics Need Not Apply, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Articles
Diagnostic testing helps caregivers and patients understand a patient's condition, predict future outcomes, select appropriate treatments, and determine whether treatment is working. Improvements in diagnostic testing are essential to bringing about the long-heralded promise of personalized medicine. Yet it seems increasingly clear that most important advances in this type of medical technology lie outside the boundaries of patent-eligible subject matter. The clarity of this conclusion has been obscured by ambiguity in the recent decisions of the Supreme Court concerning patent eligibility. Since its 2010 decision in Bilski v. Kappos, the Court has followed a discipline of limiting judicial exclusions from …
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese
William B.T. Mock
Some have proposed “alternative compensation schemes” as a means of compensating copyright owners and creators for P2P activity while avoiding litigation. Some have proposed a streamlined dispute resolution system that would allow for enforcement in a manner analogous to the UDRP model. Others question whether private copying should necessarily be viewed as illegal and whether any alternative compensation scheme is viable. With all of these proposals, the question remains as to whether “alternative compensation” is really alternative.
Understanding The Backlog Problems Associated With Requests For Continued Examination Practice, Sean Tu
Understanding The Backlog Problems Associated With Requests For Continued Examination Practice, Sean Tu
Duke Law & Technology Review
One of the greatest problems facing the current patent administration is a long patent pendency period. This study focuses on Request for Continued Examination (RCE) practice, and its effects on the current patent application backlog problem. RCEs are used to continue prosecution after a patent examiner has issued a final rejection. However, now that RCEs are placed on an examiner’s special docket, some examiners may pick up prosecution one to two years after the last action. Accordingly, there are great inefficiencies that may be created by this delay, such as relearning issues and questions from the previous action, diminished value …
The Final Impression Counts - Seeking Common Ground In Design Patent Infringement, Dana Beldiman, Paolo Beconcini
The Final Impression Counts - Seeking Common Ground In Design Patent Infringement, Dana Beldiman, Paolo Beconcini
Dana Beldiman
THE FINAL IMPRESSION COUNTS – Seeking Common Ground in Design Patent Infringement
Dana Beldiman*and Paolo Beconcini
Abstract
The visual appearance of products has become an asset of considerable economic value. Litigation surrounding it is increasingly common and has focused IP law on certain tensions that relate to the visual nature of IP assets.
One such area is design patent infringement. Policy mandates that comparison of two similar designs for purposes of evaluating infringement be performed by a notional purchaser, based on the overall impression of a design as whole. However, in performing the analysis courts are tempted to …
Patentability Of Micro-Organisms, Diamond V. Chakrabarty, Ann Amer Brennan
Patentability Of Micro-Organisms, Diamond V. Chakrabarty, Ann Amer Brennan
Akron Law Review
The decision rendered by the Supreme Court in Diamond v. Chakrabarty allows the new science of biotechnology to come out of the closet and to take its place in the public domain with other scientific achievements that have, for better or for worse, shaped the industrial life of the United States. It is probable that the products which will result from this emerging science will affect each of us in some way during our lifetimes.
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire
David E. Sorkin
What legal tools do privacy advocates have available to defend an individual’s right to privacy? How far does this right go? How should these rights be defended—or if necessary—curtailed? What is the role of Government, of the practicing bar and of academics?
Session Iv: Technology And The Future Of Privacy, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 379 (2012), David E. Sorkin, Ann Bartow, Robert S. Gurwin, Doris E. Long
Session Iv: Technology And The Future Of Privacy, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 379 (2012), David E. Sorkin, Ann Bartow, Robert S. Gurwin, Doris E. Long
David E. Sorkin
No abstract provided.
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Technology Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 242 (2005), Michael A. Geist, Doris E. Long, Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Fred Von Lohmann
Copyright & Privacy - Through The Technology Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 242 (2005), Michael A. Geist, Doris E. Long, Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Fred Von Lohmann
David E. Sorkin
How is new technology impacting on the more general question of privacy in cyberspace? Is the original notion of an expectation of anonymity on the internet still viable? Can technology pierce through the expectation of privacy even without judicial interference? Do individuals need protection from such technology? Is there technology available to protect the individual? Should these technological tools be regulated? Should the law differentiate between various types of alleged “illegal” behavior; e.g., IP infringement, defamation, possession of pornography and terrorism? Are there international standards that can assist in regulating the intersection between technology and privacy in cyberspace?
Copy Game For High Score: The First Video Game Lawsuit, 20 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2012), William K. Ford
Copy Game For High Score: The First Video Game Lawsuit, 20 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2012), William K. Ford
William K. Ford
Commentators and industry historians generally agree that the multi-billion dollar video game industry began forty years ago in November 1972 with Atari's release of Pong. Pong is among the simplest of video games: a version of ping pong or tennis requiring little more to play than a ball, two paddles, a scoring indicator, and a couple of memorable sounds. While it was not the first video game, Pong was the first video game hit. With unauthorized copying of a successful product occurring, it is not surprising that a lawsuit resulted in the fall of 1973, one that predates the more …
Games Are Not Coffee Mugs: Games And The Right Of Publicity, 29 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 1 (2012), William K. Ford, Raizel Liebler
Games Are Not Coffee Mugs: Games And The Right Of Publicity, 29 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 1 (2012), William K. Ford, Raizel Liebler
William K. Ford
Are games more like coffee mugs, posters, and T-shirts, or are they more like books, magazines, and films? For purposes of the right of publicity, the answer matters. The critical question is whether games should be treated as merchandise or as expression. Three classic judicial decisions, decided in 1967, 1970, and 1973, held that the defendants needed permission to use the plaintiffs' names in their board games. These decisions judicially confirmed that games are merchandise, not something equivalent to more traditional media of expression. As merchandise, games are not like books; instead, they are akin to celebrity-embossed coffee mugs. To …
The Evolution Of Internet Service Providers From Partners To Adversaries: Tracking Shifts In Interconnection Goals And Strategies In The Internet’S Fifth Generation, Rob Frieden
Rob Frieden
At the Internet’s inception, carriers providing the bit switching and transmission function largely embraced expanding connections and users as a primary service goal. These ventures refrained from metering traffic and charging for carriage based on the assumption that traffic volumes roughly matched, or that traffic measurement was not worth the bother in light of external funding from government grants. Most Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) bartered network access through a process known as peering in lieu of metering traffic and billing for network use. As governments removed subsidies and commercial carriers invested substantial funds to build larger and faster networks, identifying …
The Human Genome: A Patenting Dilemma, Pamela Docherty
The Human Genome: A Patenting Dilemma, Pamela Docherty
Akron Law Review
This Comment will address the conflict between the U.S. patent laws and biotechnology by focusing on the NIH patent application.
The first part of this Comment discusses the objectives and statutory requirements of the patent system, which the NIH application purportedly did not meet. Next, this Comment focuses on the debate between NIH and its detractors. It explains NIH's reasons for its actions and discusses the criticisms leveled at the agency. Finally, this Comment presents solutions to the problems that have been uncovered by this debate regarding the patentability of genes.
Of Monks, Medieval Scribes, And Middlemen, Peter K. Yu
Of Monks, Medieval Scribes, And Middlemen, Peter K. Yu
Peter K. Yu
Today's copyright debate has generally focused on the digital dilemma created by Internet and new media technologies. Threats created by emerging communications technologies, however, are not new. Throughout history, there have been remarkable similarities between the threats created by new technologies and those posed by older ones.
During the oral argument in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether the petitioners' counsel would apply the test proposed for the new technology to some once-new technologies, such as the photocopying machine, the videocassette recorder, the iPod, and the printing press. When the counsel quickly responded in the …
Digital Copyright And Confuzzling Rhetoric, Peter K. Yu
Digital Copyright And Confuzzling Rhetoric, Peter K. Yu
Peter K. Yu
The entertainment industry tells people they shouldn’t steal music because they wouldn’t steal a car, but has anybody ever downloaded a car? Music fans praise Napster and other file-sharing services for helping to free artists from the stranglehold of the music industry, but how many of these services actually have shared profits with songwriters and performing artists? Industry representatives claim that people use YouTube primarily to listen to or watch copyrighted contents, but are they missing a big piece of the user-generated content picture? Artists are encouraged to forget about copyright and hold live concerts instead, but can all artists …
The Mouse That Trolled: The Long And Tortuous History Of A Gene Mutation Patent That Became An Expensive Impediment To Alzheimer's Research, Tania Bubela, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Robert Cook-Deegan
The Mouse That Trolled: The Long And Tortuous History Of A Gene Mutation Patent That Became An Expensive Impediment To Alzheimer's Research, Tania Bubela, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Robert Cook-Deegan
Faculty Scholarship
This case study presents the tale of the academic discovery of a rare mutation for early-onset Alzheimer's disease that was patented by a sole inventor and licensed to a non-practicing entity (NPE), the Alzheimer's Institute of America (AIA). Our aims are (1) to relate this story about patents, research tools, and impediments to medical progress, and (2) to inform ongoing debates about how patents affect research, disposition of university inventions, and the distribution of benefits from publicly funded research. We present an account of the hunt for Alzheimer's genes, their patenting, assignment, and enforcement based on literature, litigation records and …
When Nominal Is Reasonable: Damages For The Unpracticed Patent, Oskar Liivak
When Nominal Is Reasonable: Damages For The Unpracticed Patent, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
To obtain a substantial patent damage award a patentee need not commercialize the patented invention; the patentee need only show that its patent was infringed. This surely incentivizes patenting but it dis-incentivizes innovation. Why commercialize yourself? The law allows you to wait for others to take the risks, and then you emerge later to lay claim to “in no event less than a reasonable” fraction of other people’s successes. It is rational to be a patent troll rather than an innovator. This troll-enabling interpretation of patent law’s reasonable royalty provision, however, is wrong as a matter of patent policy. Surprisingly, …
Freedom In My Heart, Karen Sandler
"Three Parent Babies": Techniques Explained, Objections Examined, Rebecca Carr
"Three Parent Babies": Techniques Explained, Objections Examined, Rebecca Carr
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
The UK Parliament has approved regulations, which come into force in October 2015, that permit the use of new treatment techniques to prevent the transmission of serious mitochondrial diseases from women to their children. The introduction of these techniques—which are not currently carried out in any country in the world—will fly in the face of the opposition that has been raised since discussions to permit clinical applications of the techniques first arose. After outlining some background to the techniques, this article briefly examines three of the objections that have been made against them: that the safety and effectiveness of the …