Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- China; medical negligence; litigation; selection bias; adversarial bias; judicial deference; courts; expert opinions; court appointed expert testimony; inquisitorial system; authentication; re-authentication; Supreme People's Court; documents of adjudication decisions; FA-MNA; MA-MNA; medical associations; forensic authentication agency; municipal; provincial; national; locality rule; common law; civil law; defendant; plaintiff; fault; causation; causal contribution; personal injury (1)
- Marijuana; Cannabis; Cannabis Act; Drugs; Narcotics; Tetrahydrocannabinol; THC; CBD; Coca Leaf; Legalization; Decriminalization; Possession; Prohibition; HIV; AIDS; Vienna Convention; VCLT; Single Convention on Narcotics; Convention on Psychotropic Substances; Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances; Schedule I; Schedule IV; Controlled Substances Act; CSA; INCB; WHO; World Health Organization; ECDD; CND; UNGASS; Opium Act; Hague; League of Nations; ACLU; Russia; Bolivia; Uruguay; Netherlands; Portugal; Canada; UN; United Nations; Treaties; Coffeeshops; Back Door; El Guindy; Anslinger; ECOSCO; Wolff; Nixon; Reagan; War on Drugs; Holder; Black Market; Mujica; Law 19.172; AHOJ-G; Law 30/2000; Trudeau; Bill-C-45; Le Dain Commission; Accession; Reservation; Inter Se (1)
- Palestine; PLO; Palestine Liberation Organization; United Nations; Hyderabad; Ossetia; U.N.; jus cogens; jus in bello; jus ad bellum; Treaties; Treaty Regimes; UNESCOl WHO; IMF; ICC (1)
- Statehood; Relative Statehood; Functional Statehood; De Facto Statehood; De Jure Statehood; Quasi-Statehoood; ex injuria non jus oritur; Contemporary International Law; Customary International Law; International Law; Legal Personality; Private Rights; Human Rights; International Criminal Law; Use of Force; Immunity (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
High Time For A Change: How The Relationship Between Signatory Countries And The United Nations Conventions Governing Narcotic Drugs Must Adapt To Foster A Global Shift In Cannabis Law, Alexander Clementi
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Since the early 1970’s, the inclusion of cannabis and its byproducts in the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs has mandated a strict prohibition on cultivation and use of the substance, which has led to a largely global practice of criminalization and imprisonment of anyone found to be in its possession. Yet recently, mostly in response to growing public health concerns, countries like Uruguay, Portugal, The Netherlands, Canada, and the United States have enacted laws which seek to decriminalize or even legalize cannabis use and possession. Yet, cannabis remains classified as a Schedule IV narcotic under the Single Convention, …
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law, William Thomas Worster
Functional Statehood In Contemporary International Law, William Thomas Worster
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The international community lacks a form of territorial-based, international legal personality distinct from statehood, and yet, non-state, territorial entities of varying degrees of autonomy or independence need to function within the international community in some form. Some of these entities cannot be recognized as states because their creation violates jus cogens norms, though others are not recognized based on an assessment that they may not fully qualify as a state or that there are political reasons to refuse recognition. However, existing states still need to engage with these territorial quasi-states through the only paradigm the international community has—statehood. For example, …
How Much Do Expert Opinions Matter? An Empirical Investigation Of Selection Bias, Adversarial Bias, And Judicial Deference In Chinese Medical, Chunyan Ding
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
This article investigates the nature of the operation and the role of expert opinions in Chinese medical negligence litigation, drawing on content analysis of 3,619 medical negligence cases and an in-depth survey of judges with experience of adjudicating medical negligence cases. It offers three major findings: first, that both parties to medical negligence disputes show significant selection bias of medical opinions, as do courts when selecting court-appointed experts; second, expert opinions in medical negligence litigation demonstrate substantial adversarial bias; third, courts display very strong judicial deference to expert opinions in determining medical negligence liability. This article fills the methodological gap …