Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
-
- Common Law (1)
- Communication (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Social Influence and Political Communication (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
Separation Of Powers Doctrine On The Modern Supreme Court And Four Doctrinal Approaches To Judicial Decision-Making, R. Randall Kelso
Separation Of Powers Doctrine On The Modern Supreme Court And Four Doctrinal Approaches To Judicial Decision-Making, R. Randall Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Open Secret: Why The Supreme Court Has Nothing To Fear From The Internet, Keith J. Bybee
Open Secret: Why The Supreme Court Has Nothing To Fear From The Internet, Keith J. Bybee
Institute for the Study of the Judiciary, Politics, and the Media at Syracuse University
The United States Supreme Court has an uneasy relationship with openness: it complies with some calls for transparency, drags its feet in response to others, and sometimes simply refuses to go along. I argue that the Court’s position is understandable given that the internet age of fluid information and openness has often been heralded in terms that are antithetical to the Court’s operations. Even so, I also argue the Court actually has little to fear from greater transparency. The understanding of the Court with the greatest delegitimizing potential is the understanding that the justices render decisions on the basis of …