Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Black Rock City (1)
- Black Rock Rangers (1)
- Burning Man (1)
- Burning Man Survival Guide (1)
- Cocaine (1)
-
- Collected Stories From Burning Man (1)
- Controlled substance (1)
- Criminal possession (1)
- Dirt Rangers (1)
- Dusty Order (1)
- Elyssa Lane (1)
- Kelley (1)
- Lane (1)
- Law Enforcement (1)
- New York Constitution (1)
- Noisy Neighbors (1)
- Official Law Enforcement at Burning Man (1)
- Playa Dust (1)
- Presumption of innocence (1)
- Preventive justice (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Public and Private Spaces (1)
- Samantha Krukowski (1)
- Search & seizure (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
- Stolen Bicycles (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- Unreasonable (1)
- Yellow Bikes (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
Apellate Division, Third Department, People V. Kelley, Elyssa Lane
Apellate Division, Third Department, People V. Kelley, Elyssa Lane
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dusty Order: Law Enforcement And Participant Cooperation At Burning Man, Manuel A. Gomez
Dusty Order: Law Enforcement And Participant Cooperation At Burning Man, Manuel A. Gomez
Faculty Books
Media depictions of Burning Man focus on the picturesque and eccentric appearance of the weeklong affair. The event is sometimes misportrayed as a lawless environment where participants are encouraged to engage in rowdy behavior. Most carnivalesque events offer an escape from reality and are generally thought to enable unruly conduct. Despite stereotypes, Burning Man is a different beast. Not only is the crime rate in Black Rock City lower than any other city of comparable size, but Burners show a high level of cooperative and law abiding behavior that helps maintain the social order without depending on official means of …
Preventive Justice And The Presumption Of Innocence, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Preventive Justice And The Presumption Of Innocence, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
All Faculty Scholarship
When the state aims to prevent responsible and dangerous actors from harming its citizens, it must choose between criminal law and other preventive techniques. The state, however, appears to be caught in a Catch-22: using the criminal law raises concerns about whether early inchoate conduct is properly the target of punishment, whereas using the civil law raises concerns that the state is circumventing the procedural protections available to criminal defendants. Andrew Ashworth has levied the most serious charge against civil preventive regimes, arguing that they evade the presumption of innocence.
After sketching out a substantive justification for a civil, preventive …