Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Comparative law (2)
- Witness (2)
- 1994 (1)
- Access (1)
- Admissible evidence (1)
-
- Adoption of Federal Rules (1)
- Adversary system (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Attachments (1)
- Cashman Equipment Corp (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Court (1)
- Cross examining (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Decision (1)
- Design (1)
- Discoverable (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Evidence code (1)
- Examining (1)
- Expert (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Expert witness (1)
- Expert witnesses (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federal Rules (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Foreign law (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
Provisional Measures In Aid Of Arbitration, Ronald A. Brand
Provisional Measures In Aid Of Arbitration, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
The success of the New York Convention has made arbitration a preferred means of dispute resolution for international commercial transactions. Success in arbitration often depends on the extent to which a party may secure assets, evidence, or the status quo between parties prior to the completion of the arbitration process. This makes the availability of provisional measures granted by either arbitral tribunals or by courts fundamental to the arbitration. In this Article, I consider the existing legal framework for provisional measures in aid of arbitration, with particular attention to the sources of the rules providing for such measures. Those sources …
L’Utilité Du Droit Comparé (The Utility Of Comparative Law), Vivian Grosswald Curran
L’Utilité Du Droit Comparé (The Utility Of Comparative Law), Vivian Grosswald Curran
Book Chapters
French Abstract: Cette contribution était le discours d’ouverture à la Conférence des 100 ans de l’Institut Édouard Lambert à l’Université de Lyon. Elle discute de l’utilité du droit comparé dans le monde actuel d’une perspective technique dans le cadre d’une situation aux États-Unis et d’une perspective plus politique dans le cadre d’un arrêt de la CJUE.
English Abstract: This essay was delivered as a keynote address to the conference to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Institut Édouard Lambert at the University of Lyon. It argues for the usefulness of comparative law in today’s world from a technical angle in …
Newsroom: Kuckes On Discovery Ruling 7-7-2016, Sheri Qualters, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Kuckes On Discovery Ruling 7-7-2016, Sheri Qualters, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Video: Adding To Your Case: Examining And Cross Examining Expert Witnesses, Michael J. Dale, Kathryn Webber, Valerie B. Barnhart Esq., Jack L. Harari M.D., J.D., F.A.A.E.M.
Video: Adding To Your Case: Examining And Cross Examining Expert Witnesses, Michael J. Dale, Kathryn Webber, Valerie B. Barnhart Esq., Jack L. Harari M.D., J.D., F.A.A.E.M.
NSU Law Seminar Series
Learn skills for using expert witness testimony at trial: Developing strategy for selecting topics and order of presentation Using proper form of questioning on direct and cross Understanding rules of evidence, procedure, and ethics Two role play demonstrations help you learn techniques
Should Judges Do Independent Research On Scientific Issues?, Edward K. Cheng
Should Judges Do Independent Research On Scientific Issues?, Edward K. Cheng
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Judges are deeply divided about the issue of independent research, which goes to the heart of their roles and responsibilities in the legal system. To many judges, doing independent research when confronted with new and unfamiliar material seems the most responsible and natural thing to do. To others, it represents the worst kind of overreaching and a threat to long-cherished adversarial values. But whether one supports the practice or not, one thing is clear. The issue of independent research deserves far greater attention than it has so far from jurists, academics, and practitioners alike.
The Rule In Hodge's Case: Rumours Of Its Death Are Greatly Exaggerated, Benjamin Berger
The Rule In Hodge's Case: Rumours Of Its Death Are Greatly Exaggerated, Benjamin Berger
Articles & Book Chapters
Certain academic commentators and Canadian courts have announced the death of the rule in Hodge's Case. The author challenges this proclamation of death, observing that Hodge's rule is a particular manifestation of the epistemology that informs our law of evidence. He argues not only that the rule is doctrinally intact, but that the principles and spirit that animate Hodge's rule have broad influence in our law of evidence and have utility in the appellate review of unreasonable verdicts. Hodge's rule, Hodge-like reasoning, and the associated epistemology, are alive and well in Canada.
An Empirical Test Of Justice Scalia's Commitment To The Rule Of Law, Gary S. Lawson
An Empirical Test Of Justice Scalia's Commitment To The Rule Of Law, Gary S. Lawson
Faculty Scholarship
On January 13, 2001, barely one month after the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, a group of 554 legal academics calling themselves "Law Professors for the Rule of Law" took out a full-page ad in the New York Times that essentially accused the Court's majority of being faithless to the rule of law. In full, the advertisement read: BY STOPPING THE VOTE COUNT IN FLORIDA, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT USED ITS POWER To ACT AS POLITICAL PARTISANS, NOT JUDGES OF A COURT OF LAW We are Professors of Law at 120 American law schools, from every part of …
Evidence: Indiana Moves Toward Adoption Of The Federal Rules, Ivan E. Bodensteiner
Evidence: Indiana Moves Toward Adoption Of The Federal Rules, Ivan E. Bodensteiner
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.