Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Barriers to justice (1)
- Center for Constitutional Rights (1)
- Civil liberties (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
-
- Counterterrorism policies (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Guantanamo detainees (1)
- Habeas cases (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Impact litigation (1)
- Law and social change (1)
- Legislative reform (1)
- Presidential powers (1)
- Preventive detention (1)
- Prison policy reform (1)
- Prisoner vulnerability (1)
- Rights of prisoners (1)
- Rule of law (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Social justice lawyering (1)
- Wartime national security (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
Prison Transfers And The Mootness Doctrine: Disappearing The Rule Of Law In Prisons, Spearit
Prison Transfers And The Mootness Doctrine: Disappearing The Rule Of Law In Prisons, Spearit
Book Chapters
Access to the legal system does not come easily for people in prison. There are administrative procedures that must be exhausted; federal legislation like the Prison Litigation Reform Act disadvantages prisoner-petitioners in multiple ways, including by imposing significant limits on damages and creating financial disincentives for lawyers to take on cases. Such onerous legislation and lack of legal aid ensure genuine issues evade redress. Sometimes, however, the law itself is the cause of evasion. Sometimes doctrine prevents the Rule of Law from functioning in prison, particularly when a prison-transfer moots a legal claim. In the most egregious situations, a transfer …
Victory Without Success? – The Guantanamo Litigation, Permanent Preventive Detention, And Resisting Injustice, Jules Lobel
Victory Without Success? – The Guantanamo Litigation, Permanent Preventive Detention, And Resisting Injustice, Jules Lobel
Articles
When the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) brought the first habeas cases challenging the Executive’s right to detain prisoners in a law free zone at Guantanamo in 2002, almost no legal commentator gave the plaintiffs much chance of succeeding. Yet, two years later in 2004, after losing in both the District Court and Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court in Rasul v. Bush handed CCR a resounding victory. Four years later, the Supreme Court again ruled in CCR’s favor in 2008 in Boumediene v. Bush, holding that the detainees had a constitutional right to habeas and declaring the Congressional …