Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Law (2)
- Sexual exploitation (2)
- Acknowledged peer-review (1)
- Amendment (1)
-
- Anti-Semitism (1)
- Attorneys' Fees (1)
- Cases (1)
- Civil (1)
- Claim (1)
- Commitment (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Contentious (1)
- Conversations (1)
- Court (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
- Dignity (1)
- Disputes (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equality (1)
- Events (1)
- Federal (1)
- Fee Shifting (1)
- Fifth (1)
- Fourth (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Hatred (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Rule of Law
Newsroom: The Violence In Charlottesville 08-14-2017, Michael J. Yelnosky
Newsroom: The Violence In Charlottesville 08-14-2017, Michael J. Yelnosky
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Today's Porn: Not A Constitutional Right; Not A Human Right, Patrick Trueman
Today's Porn: Not A Constitutional Right; Not A Human Right, Patrick Trueman
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Civil Rules Interpretive Theory, Lumen N. Mulligan, Glen Staszewski
Civil Rules Interpretive Theory, Lumen N. Mulligan, Glen Staszewski
Faculty Works
We claim that the proper method of interpreting the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — civil rules interpretive theory — should be recognized as a distinct field of scholarly inquiry and judicial practice. Fundamentally, the Rules are not statutes. Yet the theories of statutory interpretation that are typically imported into Rules cases by the courts rely upon a principle of legislative supremacy that is inapplicable in this context. That said, we recognize the Rules as authoritative law that is generally amenable to a form of jurisprudential purposivism. Working from this newly elucidated normative foundation, we reject the Rules-as-statutes interpretive approach …
Twenty Reasons To Publish In Dignity, Donna M. Hughes
Twenty Reasons To Publish In Dignity, Donna M. Hughes
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence
No abstract provided.
Winning The Battle But Losing The War: Towards A More Consistent Approach To Prevailing Party Fee Shifting In The Contractural Context, John R. Schleppenback
Winning The Battle But Losing The War: Towards A More Consistent Approach To Prevailing Party Fee Shifting In The Contractural Context, John R. Schleppenback
Florida A & M University Law Review
As a general matter, history has not been very kind to losers. In the turmoil of the Middle Ages, loss on the battlefield could also mean the looting of one's property, the sacking of one's home, and potentially even the assault of one's spouse. The nineteenth century was the era of "to the victors belong the spoils," meaning that an electoral win allowed the prevailing political party a complete monopoly on political appointments and government contracts to the exclusion of the loyal opposition. Even today, professional athletes would sooner face anonymity than defeat on the playing field, living by the …