Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Race (2)
- Antidiscrimination law (1)
- Bostock v Clayton County (1)
- Caste Discrimination (1)
- Charitable organization (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Crisis (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Discriminatory practices (1)
- Employment Law (1)
- Internal Revenue Service (1)
- International Law (1)
- Levine (1)
- Limitations (1)
- Pandemic (1)
- Policy (1)
- Private letter rulings (1)
- RFRA (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religion Clause jurisprudence (1)
- Religious doctrine (1)
- Religious gatherings (1)
- Religious institutions (1)
- Religious practice (1)
- Samuel Levine (1)
- Section 1981 (1)
- Sex (1)
- Sexuality (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Supreme Court’s hands-off approach to Religious questions in the era of COVID-19 and beyond (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Religion Law
Antidiscrimination And Tax Exemption, Alex Zhang
Antidiscrimination And Tax Exemption, Alex Zhang
Faculty Articles
The Supreme Court held, in Bob Jones University v. United States, that violations of fundamental public policy— including race discrimination in education—disqualify an entity for tax exemption. The holding of the case was broad, and its results cohered with the ideals of progressive society: the government ought not to subsidize discrimination, particularly of marginalized groups. But almost four decades later, the decision has never realized its antidiscriminatory potential. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has limited implementation to the narrowest facts of the case. The scholarly literature has not formulated a systematic account of how to enforce the Bob Jones …
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article discusses the issue of whether a victim of caste discrimination based on untouchability can assert a claim of intentional employment discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981. This article contends that there are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is a form of religious discrimination under Title VII. The question of whether caste discrimination is a form of race or national origin discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981 depends upon how the courts apply these definitions to caste discrimination based on untouchability. There are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is recognized within the concept …
The Supreme Court’S Hands-Off Approach To Religious Questions In The Era Of Covid-19 And Beyond, Samuel J. Levine
The Supreme Court’S Hands-Off Approach To Religious Questions In The Era Of Covid-19 And Beyond, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.