Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Legal history (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- American History (1)
- Andrew Koppelman (1)
- Brian Leiter (1)
-
- Civil liberties law (1)
- Columbia Law Review (1)
- Conscientious objection (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Early America (1)
- Federalism; religion; bill of rights; constitution; congress; free exercise (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Islam (1)
- Islamic Law (1)
- LatCrit (1)
- Law & religion (1)
- Model Penal Code (1)
- Muslims (1)
- Pre-Colonial America (1)
- Religious freedom (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- Religious minorities (1)
- SMU Law Review (1)
- Sharia (1)
- Shariah (1)
- Speech protection (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Religion Law
Islam In The Mind Of American State Courts: 1960 To 2001, Marie Failinger
Islam In The Mind Of American State Courts: 1960 To 2001, Marie Failinger
Faculty Scholarship
This project reviews how American state courts portrayed Islam and Muslims from 1960 until September 11, 2001. The purpose of this project is not to construct some overarching theoretical framework to explain American social and legal views of Islam and Muslims, though I will necessarily interpret what the cases say to some extent. Given the lengthy time period involved, the number of cases in which Muslims or Islam are referenced, and the fact that these cases come from many states, it seemed prudent to defer to others who have constructed critiques of the way American law as a whole has …
Speech And Exercise By Private Individuals And Organizations, Kent Greenawalt
Speech And Exercise By Private Individuals And Organizations, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
A central issue about redundancy concerns how far the exercise of religion is simply a form of speech that is, and should be, constitutionally protected only to the extent that reaches speech generally. Insofar as a constitutional analysis leaves flexibility, we have questions about wise legislative choices. To consider these issues carefully, we need to have a sense of what counts as relevant speech and the exercise of religion. That is the focus of this article.
It addresses the basic categorization of what counts as “speech” for freedom of speech and what counts as religious exercise when each is engaged …
The Islamic Influence In (Pre-)Colonial And Early America: A Historico-Legal Snapshot, Nadia B. Ahmad
The Islamic Influence In (Pre-)Colonial And Early America: A Historico-Legal Snapshot, Nadia B. Ahmad
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Administrative Origins Of Modern Civil Liberties Law, Jeremy K. Kessler
The Administrative Origins Of Modern Civil Liberties Law, Jeremy K. Kessler
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new explanation for the puzzling origin of modern civil liberties law. Legal scholars have long sought to explain how Progressive lawyers and intellectuals skeptical of individual rights and committed to a strong, activist state came to advocate for robust First Amendment protections after World War I. Most attempts to solve this puzzle focus on the executive branch's suppression of dissent during World War I and the Red Scare. Once Progressives realized that a powerful administrative state risked stifling debate and deliberation within civil society, the story goes, they turned to civil liberties law in order to …
Religion And Theistic Faith: On Koppelman, Leiter, Secular Purpose, And Accomodations, Abner S. Greene
Religion And Theistic Faith: On Koppelman, Leiter, Secular Purpose, And Accomodations, Abner S. Greene
Faculty Scholarship
What makes religion distinctive, and how does answering that question help us answer questions regarding religious freedom in a liberal democracy? In their books on religion in the United States under our Constitution, Andrew Koppelman (DefendingAmerican Religious Neutrality) and Brian Leiter (Why Tolerate Religion?) offer sharply different answers to this set of questions. This review essay first explores why we might treat religion distinctively, suggesting that in our constitutional order, it makes sense to focus on theism (or any roughly similar analogue) as the hallmark of religious belief and practice. Neither Koppelman nor Leiter focuses on this, in part because …
Regionalism And The Religion Clauses: The Contribution Of Fisher Ames, Marc Arkin
Regionalism And The Religion Clauses: The Contribution Of Fisher Ames, Marc Arkin
Faculty Scholarship
On August 20, 1789, Massachusetts Federalist Fisher Ames rose to address the House of Representatives in one of his rare contributions to the debate on the Bill of Rights. 1 The day before, sitting as a Committee of the Whole, the House had concluded its brief discussion of the proposed religion amendment to the federal Constitution by agreeing to New Hampshire Representative Samuel Livermore's formula that "Congress shall make no laws touching religion, or infringing the rights of conscience." 2 Now, on the 20th, before the House could formally adopt Livermore's language, Representative Ames proposed a different wording. He moved …