Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Basel Convention (1)
- Bostock v Clayton County (1)
- Caste Discrimination (1)
- Composting (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Employment Law (1)
- GCC Uniform Law for Medical Waste (GULM) (1)
- Incineration (1)
- International Law (1)
- Landfills (1)
- Non-Hazardous Waste (1)
- Race (1)
- Recycling (1)
- Religion (1)
- Saudi Arabia (1)
- Section 1981 (1)
- Sex (1)
- Sexuality (1)
- Sharia Law (1)
- Solid Waste Management (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Title VII (1)
- United Arab Emirates (1)
- Untouchability (1)
- Waste to Energy (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Religion Law
Recommendations For Strengthening The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia's Management Of Non-Hazardous Solid Waste Informed By A Comparative Assessment Of The Management Of Non-Hazardous Solid Waste In The United Arab Emirates, Saud Hani Arab
Dissertations & Theses
Despite significant changes in the category and volume of waste, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) still manages refuse the same way it did decades ago. Before 1975, waste generators were responsible for collecting and disposing of nonhazardous solid waste (NSW). The KSA later set up the Ministry of Municipalities and Rural Affairs (MOMRA) in 1975 as a result of the oil boom. One of the initial tasks of MOMRA was to manage and develop NSW system. In addition to management, MOMRA also distributed waste bins throughout the KSA and hired waste haulers to be responsible for NSW. As I …
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Does U.S. Federal Employment Law Now Cover Caste Discrimination Based On Untouchability?: If All Else Fails There Is The Possible Application Of Bostock V. Clayton County, Kevin D. Brown, Lalit Khandare, Annapurna Waughray, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Theodore M. Shaw
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article discusses the issue of whether a victim of caste discrimination based on untouchability can assert a claim of intentional employment discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981. This article contends that there are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is a form of religious discrimination under Title VII. The question of whether caste discrimination is a form of race or national origin discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981 depends upon how the courts apply these definitions to caste discrimination based on untouchability. There are legitimate arguments that this form of discrimination is recognized within the concept …