Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute v. Donovan (1)
- Benzene case (1)
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. EPA (1)
- Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
-
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. NHTSA (1)
- Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA (1)
- Cotton Dust case (1)
- De minimis exception (1)
- Default principle (1)
- Delaney Clause (1)
- Economy (1)
- Endangered Species Act (1)
- Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Feasibility (1)
- Foreign donors (1)
- Grand Canyon Air Tour Coalition v. FAA (1)
- Health-health tradeoff (1)
- Industrial Union Department AFL-CIO v. API (1)
- Liberalization (1)
- Management (1)
- Maximum contaminant level (1)
- Michigan v. EPA (1)
- Monsanto Co. v. Kennedy (1)
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA (1)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1)
- Politics (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Safe Drinking Water Act (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
Cost-Benefit Default Principles, Cass R. Sunstein
Cost-Benefit Default Principles, Cass R. Sunstein
Michigan Law Review
Courts should be reluctant to apply the literal terms of a statute to mandate pointless expenditures of effort. . .. Unless Congress has been extraordinarily rigid, there is likely a basis for an implication of de minimis authority to provide exemption when the burdens of regulation yield a gain of trivial or no value. It seems bizarre that a statute intended to improve human health would .. . lock the agency into looking at only one half of a substance's health effects in determining the maximum level for that substance. [I]t is only where there is "clear congressional intent to …
Liberalization And Politics Of Environmental Management In Tanzania, Alicia Bosensera Magabe
Liberalization And Politics Of Environmental Management In Tanzania, Alicia Bosensera Magabe
LLM Theses and Essays
This thesis examines the factors that have prevented the development of an environmental protection legal and institutional regime in Tanzania. It argues that the central focus of economic reforms has been to kick-start the economy by increasing growth through the maximization of resource exploitation. As a result, concerns for environmental sustainability have been relegated to the periphery of the development agenda. Secondly, as a result of domestic resource scarcity brought on by the economic crisis, environmental policymaking has been held hostage to the influence of foreign donors whose agendas have often been at cross-purpose to environmental protection. Thirdly, the nature …