Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Abortion; termination of pregnancy; federalism; constitutionalism; constitution; constitutional law; religion; religious fundamentalism; evangelical Christianity; Catholicism; human rights; Ireland; United States; United Kingdom; France; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; ICCPR; European Convention on Human Rights; ECHR; female bodily autonomy; Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act; PLDPA; Eighth Amendment of the Irish Constitution; feminism; politics; political ideology (1)
- Afghanistan; 2004 Constitution; Constitution-Making; Public Participation; Post-conflict States; Participatory Constitutional Design; The Right to Take Part in Constitution-writing; Democracy (1)
- Transitional Justice; Truth and Reconciliation; TRC; International Law; Restorative Justice; Epistemic Injustice; Truth Commission; Transformative Justice; Movement Lawyering; Trauma-Centered Advocacy (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
Public Participation In The Constitution-Making Process: The Afghan Experiment, Shamshad Pasarlay
Public Participation In The Constitution-Making Process: The Afghan Experiment, Shamshad Pasarlay
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
This Article explores the public participation process conducted during the drafting of Afghanistan’s 2004 Constitution. It examines scores of questionnaires, public comments, written submissions and minutes of town hall meetings that the framers used to gather public opinion and input. The Article highlights that the makers of the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan designed and implemented an extensive public participation process, but public opinion did not have a real impact on constitutional outcomes. Instead, the content of the constitution was settled by the political elites whose agreement was needed for constitutional ratification. Drawing on this case study, the paper suggests that …
The Gospel Of Federalism: How The Deification Of Political Ideology Impedes The United States’ Abortion Law Scheme, Nicole Jakobson
The Gospel Of Federalism: How The Deification Of Political Ideology Impedes The United States’ Abortion Law Scheme, Nicole Jakobson
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
In 2022, the United States Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which ended the federal abortion protection established under Roe v. Wade. The Court reasoned that abortion restriction is properly regulated by state governments, and thus a federal abortion law scheme is unconstitutional. In substance, the Court was safeguarding the enduring political and legal principle of federalism. This Note draws a comparison between the United States’ treatment of federalism and foreign jurisdictions’ treatment of religion within the context of abortion. This Note argues that the United States’ preoccupation with federalism is analogous to appeals to religion in …
Addressing The Toll Of Truth Telling, Inga N. Laurent
Addressing The Toll Of Truth Telling, Inga N. Laurent
Brooklyn Law Review
Across the United States, there are mounting and renewed calls for applying restorative justice principles to deeply entrenched societal ills based on reconciliation, namely in the form of truth and reconciliation commissions (TRCs). Amid our great mobilization, we would be wise to pause, contemplating lessons from lived experiences. Since the 1970s, approximately thirty-five national truth commissions have taken place. In South Africa, Canada, Sierra Leone, and many processes, TRCs have proven adept at cataloguing approved instances of victim and survivors’ (VS) stories and elaborately contextualizing conflict through a new historical lens. Despite the transformative potential of TRCs, they are still …