Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Baker v. State (2)
- Common Benefits Clause (2)
- Constitutional jurisprudence (2)
- Constitutional scholarship (2)
- Law and Society (2)
-
- Law school curriculum (2)
- New Judicial Federalism (2)
- Politics (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Same-sex marriage (2)
- State constitutional law (2)
- Vermont (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Business responses to regulation (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Rights (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Federal regulation (1)
- Innovative models of regulation (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Market-based incentives (1)
- Performance standards (1)
- Regulatory agencies (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
Regulation And Regulatory Processes, Cary Coglianese, Robert Kagan
Regulation And Regulatory Processes, Cary Coglianese, Robert Kagan
Robert Kagan
Regulation of business activity is nearly as old as law itself. In the last century, though, the use of regulation by modern governments has grown markedly in both volume and significance, to the point where nearly every facet of today’s economy is subject to some form of regulation. When successful, regulation can deliver important benefits to society; however, regulation can also impose undue costs on the economy and, when designed or implemented poorly, fail to meet public needs at all. Given the importance of sound regulation to society, its study by scholars of law and social science is also of …
Baker V. State And The Promise Of The New Judicial Federalism, Charles Baron, Lawrence Friedman
Baker V. State And The Promise Of The New Judicial Federalism, Charles Baron, Lawrence Friedman
Charles H. Baron
In Baker v. State, the Supreme Court of Vermont ruled that the state constitution’s Common Benefits Clause prohibits the exclusion of same-sex couples from the benefits and protections of marriage. Baker has been praised by constitutional scholars as a prototypical example of the New Judicial Federalism. The authors agree, asserting that the decision sets a standard for constitutional discourse by dint of the manner in which each of the opinions connects and responds to the others, pulls together arguments from other state and federal constitutional authorities, and provides a clear basis for subsequent development of constitutional principle. This Article explores …
The End Of A Natural Monopoly: Deregulation And Competition In The Electric Power Industry, Daniel Cole, Peter Grossman
The End Of A Natural Monopoly: Deregulation And Competition In The Electric Power Industry, Daniel Cole, Peter Grossman
Peter Z. Grossman
Note: full-text not available due to publisher restrictions. Link takes you to an external site where you can purchase the book or borrow it from a local library.
Baker V. State And The Promise Of The New Judicial Federalism, Charles Baron, Lawrence Friedman
Baker V. State And The Promise Of The New Judicial Federalism, Charles Baron, Lawrence Friedman
Charles H. Baron
In Baker v. State, the Supreme Court of Vermont ruled that the state constitution’s Common Benefits Clause prohibits the exclusion of same-sex couples from the benefits and protections of marriage. Baker has been praised by constitutional scholars as a prototypical example of the New Judicial Federalism. The authors agree, asserting that the decision sets a standard for constitutional discourse by dint of the manner in which each of the opinions connects and responds to the others, pulls together arguments from other state and federal constitutional authorities, and provides a clear basis for subsequent development of constitutional principle. This Article explores …