Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (4)
- Civil procedure (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Court (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
-
- Discrimination (3)
- Human rights (3)
- Police (3)
- Section 1983 (3)
- Defendant (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Judge (2)
- Law (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Misconduct (2)
- Plaintiff (2)
- Retributivism (2)
- 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (1)
- Active Nationality Principle (1)
- Amendment (1)
- Bias (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Claim (1)
- Collateral Consequences (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Criminal Defense (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Criminal prosecution (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
The Territorial Principle In Penal Law: An Attempted Justification, Patrick J. Fitzgerald
The Territorial Principle In Penal Law: An Attempted Justification, Patrick J. Fitzgerald
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Part Ii, John Williams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Police Misconduct - A Plaintiff's Point Of View, Fred Brewington
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Criminal Prosecution And Section 1983, Barry C. Scheck
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Procedural Due Process Claims, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Collateral Consequences: How Reliable Data And Resources Can Change The Way Law Is Practiced, Christopher Gowen, Erin Magary
Collateral Consequences: How Reliable Data And Resources Can Change The Way Law Is Practiced, Christopher Gowen, Erin Magary
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
How Much Punishment Is Enough?: Embracing Uncertainty In Modern Sentencing Reform, Jalila Jefferson-Bullock
How Much Punishment Is Enough?: Embracing Uncertainty In Modern Sentencing Reform, Jalila Jefferson-Bullock
Journal of Law and Policy
This article examines federal sentencing reform and embraces the principle of uncertainty in this process. In order to properly reapportion federal criminal sentencing laws, reformers must account for the impracticality of determining appropriate incarceration lengths at sentencing. Thus, this article proposes an alternative federal sentencing model that includes a sentencing effectiveness assessment tool to help lawmakers implement rational sentences that appropriately punish offenders, prepare them to successfully reenter society, and reduce recidivism rates. Modern sentencing reform should adopt constant review and evaluation of sentencing to measure effectiveness and ensure that appropriate sentences are implemented to avoid the pitfalls of an …