Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Aboriginal land rights (1)
- Aboriginal rights (1)
- Aboriginal title (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Canadian constitutional law (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Gun Controls (1)
- Gun Rights (1)
- Handguns (1)
- History of Canada (1)
- Indigenous land rights (1)
- Indigenous rights (1)
- Indigenous title (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Post-modern takings (1)
- Public Law (1)
- Regulatory takings law (1)
- Royal Proclamation of 1763 (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Takings clauses (1)
- Takings doctrine (1)
- Takings jurisprudence (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Public Law and Legal Theory
Handgun Article, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Takings And The Post-Modern Dialectic Of Property, Gregory S. Alexander
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The Legal Basis Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery
The Legal Basis Of Aboriginal Title, Brian Slattery
Articles & Book Chapters
This paper considers a range of differing approaches to the question of Aboriginal land rights in the light of the judgment of the B.C. Supreme Court in the Delgamuukw case.
The Law Of Choice And Choice Of Law: Abortion, The Right To Travel, And Extraterritorial Regulation In American Federalism, Seth F. Kreimer
The Law Of Choice And Choice Of Law: Abortion, The Right To Travel, And Extraterritorial Regulation In American Federalism, Seth F. Kreimer
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Autonomy's Magic Wand: Abortion And Constitutional Interpretation, Anita L. Allen
Autonomy's Magic Wand: Abortion And Constitutional Interpretation, Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Scepticism, Robin West
Constitutional Scepticism, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Interpretive constitutional debate over the last few decades has centered on two apparently linked questions: whether the Constitution can be given a determinate meaning, and whether the institution of judicial review can be justified within the basic assumptions of liberalism. Two groups of scholars have generated answers to these questions. The "constitutional faithful" argue that meaning can indeed be determinately affixed to constitutional clauses, by reference to the plain meaning of the document, the original intent of the drafters, evolving political and moral norms of the community, or the best political or moral philosophical theory available and that, because of …