Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
-
- Government Contracts (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative Law (2)
- Biography (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
-
- General Law (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Planning (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Law and Technology (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Law and policy (1)
- Law and science (1)
- Law and technology (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent purchase (1)
- Policy (1)
- Prize (1)
- Prize system (1)
- Reward (1)
- Reward system (1)
- Science (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Jutstice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And The Search For Nexus, Michael Blumm
Jutstice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And The Search For Nexus, Michael Blumm
ExpressO
Justice Anthony Kennedy, now clearly the pivot of the Roberts Court, is the Court’s crucial voice in environmental and natural resources law cases. Kennedy’s central role was never more evident than in the two most celebrated environmental and natural resources law cases of 2006: Kelo v. New London and Rapanos v. U.S., since he supplied the critical vote in both: upholding local use of the condemnation power for economic development under certain circumstances, and affirming federal regulatory authority over wetlands which have a significant nexus to navigable waters. In each case Kennedy’s sole concurrence was outcome determinative.
Justice Kennedy has …
When Second Comes First: Correcting Patent’S Poor Secondary Incentives Through An Optional Patent Purchase System, Jordan Barry
When Second Comes First: Correcting Patent’S Poor Secondary Incentives Through An Optional Patent Purchase System, Jordan Barry
ExpressO
As research has advanced, technologies have become more closely knit, and the relationships between them—both complementary and competitive—have become increasingly important. Unfortunately, the patent system’s use of monopoly power to reward innovators creates inefficient results by overly encouraging the development of substitute technologies and discouraging the development of complementary technologies. This paper explains how an optional patent purchase system could help ameliorate such problems and discusses the implications of such a system.
An Economic Analysis Of The Duty To Disclose Information: Lessons Learned From The Caveat Emptor Doctrine, Alex M. Johnson
An Economic Analysis Of The Duty To Disclose Information: Lessons Learned From The Caveat Emptor Doctrine, Alex M. Johnson
ExpressO
No abstract provided.