Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Due process (2)
- Bank v. Randell (1)
- Broker (1)
- Bulk Sales Act (1)
- Charter (1)
-
- Chicago Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Wisconsin (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Commission (1)
- Confession (1)
- Deed (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Eighteenth Amendment (1)
- Emery & Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co. (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Exception (1)
- Federal regulation (1)
- Forfeiture (1)
- In re Opinion of Justices (1)
- Injunction (1)
- Injury (1)
- Interstate Commerce Commission (1)
- Interstate commerce (1)
- Liability (1)
- Lingquist v. Loble (1)
- Liquidated damage (1)
- Mens rea (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Negotiable instrument (1)
- Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. North Dakota (1)
- Notice to quit (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
No abstract provided.
Compulsory Construction Of New Lines Of Railroad, Kenneth F. Burgess
Compulsory Construction Of New Lines Of Railroad, Kenneth F. Burgess
Michigan Law Review
In the half century of public regulation of railroads in the United States, regulatory legislation has dealt primarily with functions incident to the operation of existing enterprises. The basic concept has been that railroad corporations as common carriers have voluntarily assumed obligations to the public which the public has a right to require to be performed.
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Michigan Law Review
The Basis of Relief from Penalties and Forfeitures - The equitable principle of relief from penalties and forfeitures is so far elementary as almost to defy analysis. Many, perhaps most, of the judicial explanations of the principle have based it upon interpretation or construction, appealing to the doctrine that equity regards intent rather than form. Yet a logical application of this doctrine would lead to results very different from those which have actually been arrived at in the decisions. Thus, a stipulation in a mortgage that the mortgagor waives his equity of redemption can hardly be interpreted as meaning that …