Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AML (1)
- Anti-Money Laundering Legislation (1)
- Customer Identification Program (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- FinCEN (1)
-
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (1)
- Fourth Amendment; Cellphones; Location-based services; Cell Site Location Information; Smith v. Maryland; United States v. Miller; Third Party Doctrine; Reasonable Expectation of Privacy (1)
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1)
- Palantir (1)
- Palantir Technologies (1)
- Patriot Act (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Privacy Act (1)
- Privacy Employees (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Treasury Department (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Privacy Law
Cellphones And The Fourth Amendment: Why Cellphone Users Have A Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy In Their Location Information, Paul Cividanes
Cellphones And The Fourth Amendment: Why Cellphone Users Have A Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy In Their Location Information, Paul Cividanes
Journal of Law and Policy
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, was ratified over two hundred years ago. As such, it was impossible for the Amendment’s framers to conceive the technologies that exist today. As technology progresses, courts are often faced with the task of deciding how the Fourth Amendment should apply in the modern world. As Fourth Amendment jurisprudence has developed, the Supreme Court has originated tests and doctrines for courts to use when hearing Fourth Amendment challenges to government action. One such test, the ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ test, looks to see whether an individual has a …
The Sixth Pillar Of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance: Balancing Effective Enforcement With Financial Privacy, Maria A. De Dios
The Sixth Pillar Of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance: Balancing Effective Enforcement With Financial Privacy, Maria A. De Dios
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The U.S. government has responded to the increase of financial crimes, including money laundering and terrorist financing, by requiring that financial institutions implement anti-money laundering compliance programs within their institutions. Most recently, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network exercised its regulatory powers, as authorized by the Treasury Department, by proposing regulations that now explicitly add customer due diligence to the preexisting anti-money laundering regime. The policy behind the government’s legislative and regulatory measures is clear—financial institutions must ensure that they are protected from and not aiding in the illegal efforts of criminals. The complexity and insidiousness of these financial crimes makes …