Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
![Digital Commons Network](http://assets.bepress.com/20200205/img/dcn/DCsunburst.png)
President/Executive Department Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Immigration Law (4)
- Donald Trump (3)
- Immigration Policy (3)
- Executive Power (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (1)
- Dissenting Opinions (1)
- Executive Order on Buy American and Hire American (1)
- Executive Privilege (1)
- Family Separation Policy (1)
- Immigrants (1)
- Immigration Advocates (1)
- Immigration Enforcement (1)
- India (1)
- Law Teachers (1)
- Plenary Power (Constitutional Law) (1)
- Racism (1)
- Right of Asylum (1)
- Sonia Sotomayor (1)
- Supreme Court Justices (1)
- Travel Restrictions (1)
- Trump v. Hawaii (138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018)) (1)
- Trump v. Hawaii (138 S.Ct. 2392 (2018)) (1)
- United States. Citizenship and Immigration Services (1)
- Work visas (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in President/Executive Department
The Emerging Lessons Of Trump V. Hawaii, Shalini Bhargava Ray
The Emerging Lessons Of Trump V. Hawaii, Shalini Bhargava Ray
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In the years since the Supreme Court decided Trump v. Hawaii, federal district courts have adjudicated dozens of rights-based challenges to executive action in immigration law. Plaintiffs, including U.S. citizens, civil rights organizations, and immigrants themselves, have alleged violations of the First Amendment and the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause with some regularity based on President Trump’s animus toward immigrants. This Article assesses Hawaii’s impact on these challenges to immigration policy, and it offers two observations. First, Hawaii has amplified federal courts’ practice of privileging administrative law claims over constitutional ones. For example, courts considering …
Relentless Pursuits: Reflections Of An Immigration And Human Rights Clinician On The Past Four Years, Sarah H. Paoletti
Relentless Pursuits: Reflections Of An Immigration And Human Rights Clinician On The Past Four Years, Sarah H. Paoletti
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Deconstructing Invisible Walls: Sotomayor's Dissents In An Era Of Immigration Exceptionalism, Karla Mckanders
Deconstructing Invisible Walls: Sotomayor's Dissents In An Era Of Immigration Exceptionalism, Karla Mckanders
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Is The "Hire American" Executive Order A Suspect Classification?, Michael H. Leroy
Is The "Hire American" Executive Order A Suspect Classification?, Michael H. Leroy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
President Trump’s Executive Order 13,788 declares a “Hire American” policy for H-1B visas. This action discriminates against Indians to benefit white American workers. The technology workforce in the United States has 4.6 million jobs. Most employees in this large workforce—about 76%—are U.S.-born. In this domestic segment, 85% of employees are white. Among foreign-born workers (11.6% of all workers), Asians make up 66%, with Indians predominating.
“Hire American” renews a mostly forgotten history of discrimination against Indian workers. The Immigration Act of 1917 enacted an “Asiatic Barred Zone.” Indian immigration was curtailed to 100 annual arrivals. Typical of the period, the …
Section 4: Immigration Law Panel, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Immigration Law Panel, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.