Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Agriculture Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Economics (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
-
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Housing Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Water Law (2)
- Accounting Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Natural Resources Law
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
A Modern Disaster: Agricultural Land, Urban Growth, And The Need For A Federally Organized Comprehensive Land Use Planning Model, Jess M. Krannich
A Modern Disaster: Agricultural Land, Urban Growth, And The Need For A Federally Organized Comprehensive Land Use Planning Model, Jess M. Krannich
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Zoning And Eminent Domain Under The New Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Zoning And Eminent Domain Under The New Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Recently the Supreme Court has made it clearer that minimum scrutiny is a factual analysis. Whether in any government action there is a rational relation to a legitimate interest is a matter of determining whether there is a policy maintaining important facts. This has come about in the Court’s emerging emphasis on developing fact-based criteria for determining government purpose. Thus, those who want to affect zoning and eminent domain outcomes should look to what the Court sees as important facts, and whether government action is maintaining those facts with its proposed land use or eminent domain action.