Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Military, War, and Peace (28)
- International Law (18)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (17)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (15)
- Constitutional Law (14)
-
- Defense and Security Studies (13)
- Human Rights Law (12)
- Law and Politics (9)
- Business (8)
- Portfolio and Security Analysis (8)
- President/Executive Department (8)
- Political Science (7)
- American Politics (6)
- International Relations (6)
- Economic Policy (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Rule of Law (3)
- Science and Technology Law (3)
- Admiralty (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- University of South Florida (8)
- University of Denver (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
-
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of South Carolina (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- National security (19)
- Terrorism (12)
- Economy (6)
- Human rights (6)
- Torture (6)
-
- Intelligence studies/education (5)
- Terrorists (5)
- United States foreign policy (5)
- Intelligence analysis (4)
- Security studies (4)
- Habeas corpus (3)
- Interrogation (3)
- Security (3)
- War on Terror (3)
- 9-11 (2)
- Armed conflicts (2)
- Bush Administration (2)
- Combatants & noncombatants (International law) (2)
- DHS (2)
- Department of Homeland Security (2)
- Detention (2)
- Due process (2)
- Due process of law (2)
- Guantanamo Bay (2)
- History (2)
- Illegal (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Methodology (2)
- National Security (2)
- Preventive paradigm (2)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Strategic Security (8)
- William Mitchell Law Review (8)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Publications (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Sea Grant Law Fellow Publications (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- David S. Jonas (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- NULR Online (1)
- Paul Diller (1)
- Russell A. Miller (1)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (1)
- Washington International Law Journal (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 74 of 74
Full-Text Articles in National Security Law
Torture And The Biopolitics Of Race, Dorothy E. Roberts
Torture And The Biopolitics Of Race, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Soft Power And Persuasion Of Translations In The War On Terror: Words And Wisdom In The Transformation Of Legal Systems, Donald J. Kochan
The Soft Power And Persuasion Of Translations In The War On Terror: Words And Wisdom In The Transformation Of Legal Systems, Donald J. Kochan
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shortchanging The Joint Fight? An Airman’S Assessment Of Fm 3-24 And The Case For Developing Truly Joint Coin Doctrine, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Shortchanging The Joint Fight? An Airman’S Assessment Of Fm 3-24 And The Case For Developing Truly Joint Coin Doctrine, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
Since the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, controversy has raged over nearly every provision. The controversy has been particularly intense over provisions that affect the patrons of libraries. This article follows those Patriot Act provisions that affect libraries, and reviews how they have been interpreted, how the Patriot Reauthorization Acts have changed them, and what government audits and court affidavits reveal about the use and misuse of the Patriot Act. The efforts of librarians and others opposed to the Patriot Act have had an effect, both legislatively and judicially, in changing and challenging the Patriot Act. Because libraries are …
Book Review, Susan Nevelow Mart
Liberty, Judicial Review, And The Rule Of Law At Guantanamo: A Battle Half Won, Doug Cassell
Liberty, Judicial Review, And The Rule Of Law At Guantanamo: A Battle Half Won, Doug Cassell
Journal Articles
In Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), five members of the Supreme Court held that foreign prisoners at Guantanamo enjoy the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus; that their imprisonment had lasted too long for the Court to await completion of statutory review by lower courts of military tribunal findings that the prisoners were "enemy combatants"; and that the statutory judicial review was too deficient to substitute for the Great Writ.
Four Justices vigorously dissented. On the surface they differed on the history of the reach of the common law writ of habeas corpus, and on the procedural …
The Memory Gap In Surveillance Law, Patricia L. Bellia
The Memory Gap In Surveillance Law, Patricia L. Bellia
Journal Articles
U.S. information privacy laws contain a memory gap: they regulate the collection and disclosure of certain kinds of information, but they say little about its retention. This memory gap has ever-increasing significance for the structure of government surveillance law. Under current doctrine, the Fourth Amendment generally requires government agents to meet high standards before directly and prospectively gathering a target's communications. The law takes a dramatically different approach to indirect, surveillance-like activities, such as the compelled production of communications from a third party, even when those activities yield the same information as, or more information than, direct surveillance activities. Because …
Tinkering With Torture In The Aftermath Of Hamdan: Testing The Relationship Between Internationalism And Constitutionalism, Catherine Powell
Tinkering With Torture In The Aftermath Of Hamdan: Testing The Relationship Between Internationalism And Constitutionalism, Catherine Powell
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Bridging international and constitutional law scholarship, the author examines the question of torture in light of democratic values. The focus in this article is on the international prohibition on torture as this norm was addressed through the political process in the aftermath of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. Responding to charges that the international torture prohibition--and international law generally--poses irreconcilable challenges for democracy and our constitutional framework, the author contends that by promoting respect for fundamental rights and for minorities and outsiders, international law actually facilitates a broad conception of democracy and constitutionalism. She takes on the question of torture within …
Conflicts Between The Commander In Chief And Congress: Concurrent Power Over The Conduct Of War, Jules Lobel
Conflicts Between The Commander In Chief And Congress: Concurrent Power Over The Conduct Of War, Jules Lobel
Articles
The Bush Administration argues that the Commander in Chief has exclusive power to decide what military tactics to use to defeat a wartime enemy. The Administration's constitutional position that Congress may not permissibly interfere with these Executive Commander in Chief powers has been heavily criticized, particularly with respect to the Executive power to interrogate prisoners or engage in warrantless wiretapping on American citizens and its argument that Congress cannot limit the Iraq war. Yet, many critics concur in the Administration's starting point - that the President has exclusive authority over battlefield operations.
This article challenges that assumption. It argues that …
Colonial Presumptions: The War On Terror And The Roots Of American Exceptionalism, Natsu Taylor Saito
Colonial Presumptions: The War On Terror And The Roots Of American Exceptionalism, Natsu Taylor Saito
Faculty Publications By Year
The United States' current "war on terror" has been framed as a struggle for "civilization"; one which requires a "new paradigm of international law." The rationale for the United States' selective self-exemption from otherwise applicable international law in conducting this war has been that new and imminent threats require the re-shaping of legal doctrines. This essay considers this rationale against the backdrop of three centuries of American visions and policies, and the legal justifications put forth to justify Euroamerican expansion. It concludes that the justifications for American exceptionalism have been remarkably consistent throughout its history and that, as a result, …
Panel: Restrictions On Freedom Of Association Through Material Support Prohibitions And Visa Denials, David Cole
Panel: Restrictions On Freedom Of Association Through Material Support Prohibitions And Visa Denials, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In the 1950s, we were afraid of communism. We were afraid, in particular, of the Soviet Union, the world's second greatest superpower, which was armed with masses of nuclear warheads aimed at all our largest cities. As a result, we fought the Cold War, engaged in espionage, proxy wars, and an arms race. We also took aggressive preventive measures at home. The principal preventive measure of that period was guilt by association. We made it a crime to be a member of the Communist Party, and we created a whole administrative scheme to implement and enforce this notion of guilt …
Less Safe, Less Free: A Progress Report On The War On Terror: Address To The Terrorism & Justice Conference At The University Of Central Missouri, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Bush Administration since 9-11 has adopted a strategy, which in some sense depends upon the ability to predict with incredible accuracy at what will happen in the future. It was given its name by the U.S. Attorney General during the first Bush Administration, Missouri’s John Ashcroft, who argued that what we need in the wake of 9-11 is a “preventive paradigm.” The argument is understandable: when facing foes who are willing to commit suicide in order to inflict mass casualties on innocent civilians, it is not enough to bring them to justice after the fact. The perpetrators are dead--and …
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
International Standards For Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond The Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide, Monica Hakimi
Articles
Although sometimes described as war, the fight against transnational jihadi groups (referred to for shorthand as the "fight against terrorism") largely takes place away from any recognizable battlefield. Terrorism suspects are captured in houses, on street comers, and at border crossings around the globe. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the high-level Qaeda operative who planned the September 11 attacks, was captured by the Pakistani government in a residence in Pakistan. Abu Omar, a radical Muslim imam, was apparently abducted by U.S. and Italian agents off the streets of Milan. And Abu Baker Bashir, the spiritual leader of the Qaeda-affiliated group responsible for …
Us National Security, Intelligence And Democracy: From The Church Committee To The War On Terror, Russell Miller
Us National Security, Intelligence And Democracy: From The Church Committee To The War On Terror, Russell Miller
Russell A. Miller
No abstract provided.