National Security Law Commons^™

The First Amendment And National Security, Floyd Abrams, Henry Mark Holzer, Don Oberdorfer, Richard K. Willard

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Do We Have An Imperial Congress?, John Norton Moore

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Intelligence In A Free Society, William H. Webster

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Treaty Power, Harold Hongju Koh, John Nowak, Grover Joseph Rees, Abraham D. Sofaer

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V, Rostow, Michael Tigar

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Virtues And Vices Of Democracy In Conducting Foreign Affairs, Godfrey Hodgson, Irving Kristol, Gordon Tullock

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Forging A Bipartisan And Strategic Approach To Foreign Affairs, Zbigniew Brzezinski

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The President's Powers As Commander-In-Chief Versus Congress' War Power And Appropriations Power, Charles Bennett, Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr., Geoffrey P. Miller, William Bradford Reynolds, William Van Alstyne

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Congress: Friend Or Foe In Foreign Policy?, Richard Perle

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Fidelity And Foreign Affairs, Edwin Meese Iii

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Army's Command Sergeant Major Problem, John C. Bahnsen, James W. Bradin

The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters

No abstract provided.

Political And Legal Instruments In Supporting And Combating Terrorism: Current Developments, Rett R. Ludwikowski

Scholarly Articles

A historian is a prophet of the past, not of the future, and a question about the future is not a historian's favorite one. With all these reservations, a historian is often compelled to trace past and present patterns in order to foresee the most likely arrangements of future events. The reflections presented below (in Part I) do not stem from the intention of the author to speculate about the prospects of Communism or discuss the alternative scenarios for the future of the Soviet bloc. They are limited to a few conclusions which can be drawn from the logical progression …

Foreign Relations And National Security Law, Stuart S. Malawer

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

"Foreign relations law" as it relates to foreign policy and national security is an area of specialization that has recently witnessed publication of two significant works. A third major publication has already appeared in final draft and is about to be printed. These publications evidence the growth of foreign relations law and validate it as a separate field of study. This distinct area of the law draws subjects from other areas, which are all too often given minimal attention, into a coherent course with a specific focus.

Foreign relations law should be the introductory course in international studies in law …

Review Essay: The Future Of National Security Export Controls, Donald H. Caldwell, Jr.

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

In calling for more narrowly focused controls, this study echoes the Bucy Report of 1976, one that called for restrictions on revolutionary rather than evolutionary technology.56 Yet more than a decade after that report was issued, United States export control lists are still weighted toward restricting all exports containing useful technology whether or not the export of an item would advance the capabilities of American adversaries to any degree.17 Unless industry leaders seize the opportunity to reduce the scope of national security export controls as Congress prepares to reauthorize the Export Administration Act, this report, like the Bucy Report before …

What The Constitution Means By Executive Power, Charles J. Cooper, Orrin Hatch, Eugene V. Rowstow, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Arms Control Inspection: Constitutional Restriction On Treaty Verification In The United States, David A. Koplow

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The United States and the Soviet Union recently signed a treaty that eliminates an entire class of nuclear arms, and allows more intrusive verification procedures than ever before. As technology improves and verification becomes even more central in arms control negotiations, Professor Koplow warns that the United States Constitution limits the types of verification procedures to which the United States can agree. After reviewing existing United States-Soviet Union arms control treaties and agreements, Professor Koplow examines potential verification procedures in light of the fourth amendment's protection of United States citizens from government intrusion. He argues that although many contemplated verification …

Policy, Procedures, And People: Governmental Response To A Privately Initiated Nuclear Test Monitoring Project As A Case Study In National Security Decision-Making, Philip G. Schrag

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This article applies the Allisonian framework to the U.S. Government's response to a private arms control initiative undertaken in 1986 by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), an environmental organization. This case lends itself to fruitful analysis for several reasons. First, while it fits the criteria for second-level decisions, it also involves a critical area of international relations-the control of nuclear weapons. Second, the involvement of numerous government agencies in the project presents ample opportunity to examine processes within and among agencies. Third, the reaction of the United States appears, at first blush, to have been ambivalent or inconsistent, for …

International Law And Terrorism: Age-Old Problems, Different Targets, Sharon A. Williams

Articles & Book Chapters

In the context of increasing terrorist attacks and a unified, internal approach to addressing the problem, this article will consider the following issues: first, should the eradication of the so-called "root causes" of terrorism take precedence over conventions to suppress or punish terrorists; second, the gaps that have been found in the existing multilateral convention approach to international terrorism, and third, the steps that have been taken recently by the concerned specialized agencies of the United Nations to remedy the situation.