Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Chinese Embassy (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Duty of Care (1)
- Facebook (1)
-
- Freedom of Privacy (1)
- Gaza Beach Attack (1)
- Humanitarian Law (1)
- ICCPR (1)
- IHL (1)
- Instagram (1)
- Intelligence (1)
- Intelligence Operations (1)
- Intelligence Studies (1)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Israel (1)
- Laws of War (1)
- Military Law (1)
- Monte Cassino (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Occupation (1)
- Oslo Accords (1)
- Palestine (1)
- Precautionary Principle (1)
- Public International Law (1)
- Reasonable Intelligence Agency (1)
- Reasonableness (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Wartime (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Military, War, and Peace
The Oslo Accords: A Modern-Day Story Of Occupation Told Through Violations Of The Right To Freedom Of Privacy, Catherine Demetrovich
The Oslo Accords: A Modern-Day Story Of Occupation Told Through Violations Of The Right To Freedom Of Privacy, Catherine Demetrovich
Indiana Law Journal
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict began in the early 1900s when the disputed land, what is now the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, fell under British rule. After the Six- Day War in 1967, Israel took control of the West Bank, Golan Heights, and the Gaza Strip. Since then, tensions between Israel and Palestine have continued to grow. This Note explores a modern-day occupation question: Israel’s control over Palestine’s information and communication technology (ICT) sector. Along with privacy and human rights violations, Israel’s control is in direct violation of the Oslo Accords— guaranteeing Palestinians limited self-governance in Gaza and the West …
The Reasonable Intelligence Agency, Asaf Lubin
The Reasonable Intelligence Agency, Asaf Lubin
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Article 57(2) of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions requires parties to an armed conflict to “do everything feasible to verify” their objects of attack and take “all precautions” to minimize civilian casualties and unintentional damage to civilian property. This obligation has been interpreted in international law to require state parties to set up an “effective intelligence gathering system” that would properly identify targets using all technical means at the disposal of the combating forces.
But existing law has failed to define what “effective intelligence” looks like. Quite the opposite. Modern history is filled with examples of intelligence …