Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
Medical Malpractice Reform?, Robert B. Leflar
Medical Malpractice Reform?, Robert B. Leflar
Robert B Leflar
Column 3 (of 5) on health reform: Medical malpractice reform proposals
Health Bills: What's At The Core, Robert B. Leflar
Health Bills: What's At The Core, Robert B. Leflar
Robert B Leflar
Column 2 (of 5) on the health reform debate: explanation of the legislation.
Health Care: Yellow Lights, Red Flags, Robert B. Leflar
Health Care: Yellow Lights, Red Flags, Robert B. Leflar
Robert B Leflar
Column 1 (of 5) on the health reform debate
The Tort Of Betrayal Of Trust, Caroline Forell, Anna Sortun
The Tort Of Betrayal Of Trust, Caroline Forell, Anna Sortun
Caroline A Forell
Fiduciary betrayal is a serious harm. When the fiduciary is a doctor or a lawyer, and the entrustor is a patient or client, this harm frequently goes unremedied. Betrayals arise out of disloyalty and conflicts of interest where the lawyer or doctor puts his or her interest above that of his or her client or patient. It causes dignitary harm that is different from the harm flowing from negligent malpractice. Nevertheless, courts, concerned with overdeterrence, have for the most part refused to allow a separate claim for betrayal. In this Article, we suggest that betrayal deserves a remedy and propose …
The Regulation Of Medical Malpractice In Japan, Robert Leflar
The Regulation Of Medical Malpractice In Japan, Robert Leflar
Robert B Leflar
How Japanese legal and social institutions handle medical errors is little known outside Japan. For almost all of the 20th century, a paternalistic paradigm prevailed. Characteristics of the legal environment affecting Japanese medicine included few attorneys handling medical cases, low litigation rates, long delays, predictable damage awards, and low-cost malpractice insurance. However, transparency principles have gained traction and public concern over medical errors has intensified. Recent legal developments include courts' adoption of a less deferential standard of informed consent; increases in the numbers of malpractice claims and of practicing attorneys; more efficient claims handling by specialist judges and speedier trials; …