Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust; Parker immunity; CON law(s); Certificate of Need; COVID-19; Government regulation; Government over-regulation; Too much regulation; Small government; Healthcare; Cost of healthcare; Issues with healthcare; Healthcare system; Anti-competitive; Sherman act; Rule of reason (1)
- Physician-assisted death; Physician-assisted suicide; Euthanasia; Suicide; Medical Aid in Dying; Aid in Dying; Assisted Dying; Canada; United States; United States of America; Oregon; ALS; Federal Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997; Death with dignity; Criminal Code; Medical illness; State law; Right to die; End-of-life experience (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
Embracing The End: A Comparative Analysis Of Medical Aid In Dying In Canada And The United States, Joel Krinsky
Embracing The End: A Comparative Analysis Of Medical Aid In Dying In Canada And The United States, Joel Krinsky
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
Since the late nineteenth century, debate has unfolded over the use of euthanasia and physician-assisted death to alleviate the suffering of individuals with medical illnesses. The controversy surrounding the issue persists and its implications are significant. While most countries prohibit Aid in Dying (AID), legalization of the practice has expanded globally in recent years. Canada and the United States (US) are two such jurisdictions that have expanded access to AID. Canada has federally legalized the practice, which the country refers to as Medical Aid in Dying (MAID), and in 2021, the country expanded the eligibility criteria for individuals seeking access …
Lessons Covid-19 Taught: How The Global Pandemic Demonstrated That State Healthcare Regulations Can Kill, Devon Allgood
Lessons Covid-19 Taught: How The Global Pandemic Demonstrated That State Healthcare Regulations Can Kill, Devon Allgood
Brooklyn Law Review
Certificate of Need (CON) laws are designed to lower the cost of healthcare and have been a staple of American law for over half a century. In the most basic sense, CON laws require that medical providers receive the government’s permission to build a new healthcare facility, purchase major medical equipment, add or remove services, and in some cases, change their hours of operation. These requirements are designed to lower the price of healthcare by limiting competition and barring providers from investing in services or equipment that are deemed “unnecessary” by the government, thus preventing these providers from passing the …