Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Federalism (2)
- 505 U.S. 833 (1992) (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion regulations (1)
- Child support (1)
-
- Divorce (1)
- Donated sperm (1)
- Estates and trusts (1)
- Informed Consent (1)
- Informed-consent dialogue (1)
- Inheritance (1)
- Legitimate children (1)
- Marijuana (1)
- Maryland (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Medical marijuana (1)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1)
- Postabortion suicide risk (1)
- Recreational marijuana (1)
- Regulatory Spillover (1)
- State regulation of abortion (1)
- Undue burden (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
Federalism And State Marijuana Legislation, Dean M. Nickles
Federalism And State Marijuana Legislation, Dean M. Nickles
Notre Dame Law Review
An increasing number of states have passed legislation legalizing medical and recreational marijuana. This Note provides a survey of the language utilized by these states in their legislation and legislative materials, searching for and highlighting those purposes and intentions of the states, which implicate, explicitly or implicitly, federalism. Through this survey of mostly primary source materials, various trends and similarities among the materials will be apparent, and this Note will provide a useful resource for those trying to understand why the states may have enacted these laws.
Abortion, Informed Consent, And Regulatory Spillover, Katherine A. Shaw, Alex Stein
Abortion, Informed Consent, And Regulatory Spillover, Katherine A. Shaw, Alex Stein
Indiana Law Journal
The constitutional law of abortion stands on the untenable assumption that any state’s abortion regulations impact citizens of that state alone. On this understand-ing, the state’s boundaries demarcate the terrain on which women’s right to abortion clashes with state power to regulate that right.
This Article uncovers a previously unnoticed horizontal dimension of abortion regulation: the medical-malpractice penalties imposed upon doctors for failing to inform patients about abortion risks; the states’ power to define those risks, along with doctors’ informed-consent obligations and penalties; and, critically, the possi-bility that such standards might cross state lines. Planned Parenthood v. Casey and other …
Recent Development: Sieglein V. Schmidt: Pursuant To § 1-206(B) Of The Estates And Trusts Article, Artificial Insemination Encompasses In Vitro Fertilization Using Donated Sperm; A Court May Use The Goldberger Factors To Determine Voluntary Impoverishment; A Trial Court Can Issue A Permanent Injunction For Harassment Based On § 1-203(A) Of The Family Law Article., Virginia J. Yeoman
University of Baltimore Law Forum
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that the term “artificial insemination” includes in vitro fertilization using donated sperm, and that a consenting husband is presumed to be the father of the child born as a result of the procedure. Sieglein v. Schmidt, 447 Md. 647, 652, 136 A.3d 751, 754 (2016). The court also held that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in finding the husband to be voluntarily impoverished or in issuing a permanent injunction based on harassment. Id.