Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Medical Jurisprudence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence

Utah Government Immunity Act And Government Hospitals: Condemarin V. University Hospital, Michael A. Royal May 1990

Utah Government Immunity Act And Government Hospitals: Condemarin V. University Hospital, Michael A. Royal

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.


A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli Jan 1990

A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Re E.G., A Minor: Death Over Life: A Judicial Trend Continues As The Illinois Supreme Court Grants Minors The Right To Refuse Life-Saving Medical Treatment, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 771 (1990), William D. Brewster Jan 1990

In Re E.G., A Minor: Death Over Life: A Judicial Trend Continues As The Illinois Supreme Court Grants Minors The Right To Refuse Life-Saving Medical Treatment, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 771 (1990), William D. Brewster

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli Jan 1990

A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


Synthesizing Related Rules From Statutes And Cases For Legal Expert Systems, Layman E. Allen, Sallyanne Payton, Charles S. Saxon Jan 1990

Synthesizing Related Rules From Statutes And Cases For Legal Expert Systems, Layman E. Allen, Sallyanne Payton, Charles S. Saxon

Articles

Different legal expert systems may be incompatible with each other: A user in characterizing the same situation by answering the questions presented in a consultation can be led to contradictory inferences. Such systems can be ”synthesized’ to help users avoid such contradictions by alerting them that other relevant systems are available to be consulted as they are responding to questions. An example of potentially incompatible, related legal expert systems is presented here - ones for the New Jersey murder statute and the celebrated Quinlan case, along with one way of synthesizing them to avoid such incompatibility.