Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Litigation Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Litigation

Service Of Process By Mail, Michigan Law Review Dec 1975

Service Of Process By Mail, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note examines the operation of the return-receipt requirement and concludes that, in light of the procedures available to a defendant to challenge service and to reopen default judgments entered against him, the requirement of a signed receipt is unduly harsh on plaintiffs. In the course of this examination, the Note details the means by which a defendant can avoid service by mail in a return-receipt jurisdiction and explains the operation of the various motions to challenge service of process, which, it is asserted, can protect the defendant as well as a return-receipt requirement.


Counterclaim And Countersuit Harassment Of Private Environmental Plaintiffs: The Problem, Its Implications, And Proposed Solutions, Michigan Law Review Nov 1975

Counterclaim And Countersuit Harassment Of Private Environmental Plaintiffs: The Problem, Its Implications, And Proposed Solutions, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note first outlines the basic characteristics of the counteraction strategy and considers the implications of its future proliferation and then analyzes proposals to eliminate or ameliorate the impact of the strategy in terms of their effectiveness and practicability.


Providing An Effective Remedy In Shareholder Suits Against Officers, Directors, And Controlling Persons, Michael H. Woolever Jan 1975

Providing An Effective Remedy In Shareholder Suits Against Officers, Directors, And Controlling Persons, Michael H. Woolever

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Corporate officers, directors, and controlling persons occupy a fiduciary relationship toward the corporation and its shareholders in the exercise of control over corporate affairs. This fiduciary obligation requires that officers, directors, and controlling persons act in good faith and perform their offices in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders and not to their own advantage. When this duty is breached, a shareholder may bring an action against these fiduciaries, either in his own name or derivatively for the benefit of the corporation. Under present law, however, it may be impossible for an American court to secure jurisdiction …


Collateral Estoppel: Loosening The Mutuality Rule In Tax Litigation, Michigan Law Review Jan 1975

Collateral Estoppel: Loosening The Mutuality Rule In Tax Litigation, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Collateral estoppel is an aspect of the doctrine of res judicata that precludes relitigation of issues previously adjudicated. A judgment in a prior action may be held conclusive as to issues in a subsequent case. even though the later case technically involves a different cause of action. The rule of collateral estoppel seeks to conserve judicial energy, promote confidence in the judicial system, avoid litigant expense, promote community peace and reliance on judgments, and minimize inconsistent results. Countervailing policy concerns are the right of each person to have his day in court, the fear of increased litigation, the danger of …