Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Forum non conveniens (2)
- Transnational litigation (2)
- Access to Justice (1)
- Ad hoc discretionary review (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
-
- Australia (1)
- Burford Capital (1)
- Champerty (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Court Access (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Doctrinal Interaction (1)
- Economic incentives (1)
- Ecuadorian litigation (1)
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (1)
- Enforcement of Judgments (1)
- Enforcement of foreign judgments (1)
- England (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Foreign Judgments (1)
- Forum Non Conveniens (1)
- Forum Shopping (1)
- Forum selection (1)
- Interlocutory review (1)
- International Litigation (1)
- Judgment Enforcement (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Mandamus review (1)
- Regulation and litigation (1)
- Social impacts (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Forum Non Conveniens On Appeal: The Case For Interlocutory Review, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Forum Non Conveniens On Appeal: The Case For Interlocutory Review, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Faculty Publications
Court-access doctrine in transnational litigation is plagued by uncertainty. Without a national court-access policy, federal courts often reach inconsistent forum non conveniens decisions even on very similar facts. This inconsistency is compounded by the district court’s largely unreviewable discretion in making those forum-access decisions, which precludes effective resolution of these conflicts through the appellate process. As a result, the law underlying the forum non conveniens doctrine remains unsettled, creating systemic inefficiency both in litigation procedure and in regulatory policy.
This article, prepared for the symposium “Our Courts and the World: Transnational Litigation and Civil Procedure,” argues that expanding appellate review …
Forum Non Conveniens And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments, Christopher A. Whytock, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Forum Non Conveniens And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments, Christopher A. Whytock, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Faculty Publications
When citizens of Ecuador sued Texaco, Inc. in a U.S. court seeking damages for oil contamination in the Amazon, Texaco successfully moved to dismiss the suit in favor of Ecuador based on the forum non conveniens doctrine, arguing – as that doctrine requires – that Ecuador was an adequate alternative forum and more appropriate than the United States for hearing the suit. The plaintiffs then refiled the suit in Ecuador, and a court there entered a multi-billion dollar judgment against Chevron Corporation, which had merged with Texaco. Chevron now argues that the Ecuadorian legal system suffers from deficiencies that should …
The Impact Of Third-Party Financing On Transnational Litigation, Cassandra Burke Robertson
The Impact Of Third-Party Financing On Transnational Litigation, Cassandra Burke Robertson
Faculty Publications
Third-party litigation finance is a growing industry. The practice, also termed “litigation lending,” allows funders with no other connection to the lawsuit to invest in a plaintiff’s claim in exchange for a share of the ultimate recovery. Most funding agreements have focused on domestic litigation in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. However, the industry is poised for growth worldwide, and the recent environmental lawsuit brought by Ecuadorian plaintiffs against Chevron demonstrates that litigation funding is also beginning to play a role in transnational litigation.
This article, prepared for a symposium on “International Law in Crisis,” speculates about …