Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- Anti-SLAPP statutes (1)
- Article III (1)
- Cases and controversies (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
-
- Class actions (1)
- Comparative law and procedure (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Courts (1)
- Defamation (1)
- Evidence (1)
- FRCP 12 & 56 (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Incentives and motivations for litigation (1)
- Information litigation (1)
- Informational injury (1)
- Injury in fact (1)
- Justiciability (1)
- Legal practice (1)
- Legal sociology (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Private enforcement (1)
- Pro-plaintiff fee shifting (1)
- SLAPP (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury (1)
- Standing to sue (1)
- Strategic lawsuits against public participation (1)
- Torts (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
“Spooky Action At A Distance”: Intangible Injury In Fact In The Information Age, Seth F. Kreimer
“Spooky Action At A Distance”: Intangible Injury In Fact In The Information Age, Seth F. Kreimer
All Faculty Scholarship
Two decades after Justice Douglas coined “injury in fact” as the token of admission to federal court under Article III, Justice Scalia sealed it into the constitutional canon in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife. In the two decades since Lujan, Justice Scalia has thrown increasingly pointed barbs at the permissive standing doctrine of the Warren Court, maintaining it is founded on impermissible recognition of “Psychic Injury.” Justice Scalia and his acolytes take the position that Article III requires a tough minded, common sense and practical approach. Injuries in fact must be "tangible" "direct" "concrete" "de facto" realities in time and …
Procedure And Pragmatism, Stephen B. Burbank
Procedure And Pragmatism, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, prepared as part of a festschrift for the Italian scholar, Michele Taruffo, I portray him as a pragmatic realist of the sort described by Richard Posner in his book, Reflections on Judging. Viewing him as such, I salute Taruffo for challenging the established order in domestic and comparative law thinking about civil law systems, the role of lawyers, courts and precedent in those systems, and also for casting the light of the comparative enterprise on common law systems, particularly that in the United States. Speaking as one iconoclast of another, however, I also raise questions about Taruffo’s …
A Curious Motion: The Uncertain Role Of Anti-Slapp Statutes In Federal Courts, Markus A. Brazill
A Curious Motion: The Uncertain Role Of Anti-Slapp Statutes In Federal Courts, Markus A. Brazill
Prize Winning Papers
No abstract provided.