Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Federal Securities Law (2)
- Hernández v. Mesa (2)
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2)
- Social Media Regulation (2)
-
- 3D Printing (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (1)
- Bar Exam (1)
- Black Law Students Association (1)
- Black Lawyers (1)
- Constitution's Taxing and Spending Clause (1)
- Corporate Diversity (1)
- Corporate Law (1)
- Fair Use (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Grading (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Internet Property Rights (1)
- LGBTQ Rights (1)
- Law School Grades (1)
- Mexico (1)
- Online Disinformation (1)
- Outer Space Arms Race (1)
- Patent Infringement (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Hernández V. Mesa: A Case For A More Meaningful Partnership With The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights, Peyton Jacobsen
Hernández V. Mesa: A Case For A More Meaningful Partnership With The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights, Peyton Jacobsen
Seattle University Law Review
Through an in-depth examination of Hernández, the Inter-American Human Rights System, and the success of Mexico’s partnership with said system, this Note will make a case for embracing human rights bodies— specifically, the Inter-American System on Human Rights—as an appropriate and necessary check on the structures that form the United States government. Part I will look closely at the reasoning and judicially created doctrine that guided the decision in Hernández, with the goal of providing a better understanding of the complicated path through the courts that led to a seemingly straightforward yet unsatisfying result. Part II will illustrate the scope …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Creativity For The Common Good: The Case For Fair Use Of Prosthetics Patents, Roxanneh Mousavi
Creativity For The Common Good: The Case For Fair Use Of Prosthetics Patents, Roxanneh Mousavi
Seattle University Law Review
This Note examines how patent law inhibits accessibility to prosthetics, and how a fair use defense for patent infringement will make them more widely accessible. Part I will explain the basics of patent law, including its history, scope, and process of infringement. Part II will discuss the fair use defense against copyright and trademark infringement and explain why this defense should also be enforceable for patent infringement. Part III will provide an overview of 3D printing. Part IV will focus on 3D prosthetics, specifically on the story of two young prosthetic recipients, Griffin Matuszek and Evie Lambert. Finally, Part V …
Regulating Fraud On The Marketplace Of Ideas: Federal Securities Law As A Model For Constitutionally Permissible Social Media Regulation, Michael M. Epstein
Regulating Fraud On The Marketplace Of Ideas: Federal Securities Law As A Model For Constitutionally Permissible Social Media Regulation, Michael M. Epstein
Seattle University Law Review
This article begins with an introduction discussing speech falsity and the duty under U.S. law by comparing commercial and noncommercial speech. Part I explores the problem of online disinformation. Part II addresses online disinformation in a non-commercial context. Part III contains three subsections assesses non-transactional commercial speech as a basis for non-commercial disinformation regulation. Part IV advocates for a fiduciary duty to fashion a remedy. Part V of this article concludes by suggesting a possible solution for creating a online disinformation law that could survive the First Amendment.
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review