Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- California (2)
- Damages (2)
- Empirical studies (2)
- Juries (2)
- Lawyers (2)
-
- Settlements (2)
- Trials (2)
- Verdicts (2)
- And Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral (1)
- Caseloads (1)
- Compensatory damages awards (1)
- Douglas Melamed (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Guido Calabresi (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Liability Rules (1)
- Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Personal injuries (1)
- Property Rules (1)
- Punitive damages awards (1)
- Relationship between compensatory and punitive damages awards (1)
- Strategic bargaining (1)
- Strategy (1)
- Surveys (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
The Predictability Of Punitive Damages, Theodore Eisenberg, John Goerdt, Brian Ostrom, David Rottman, Martin T. Wells
The Predictability Of Punitive Damages, Theodore Eisenberg, John Goerdt, Brian Ostrom, David Rottman, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Using one year of jury trial outcomes from 45 of the nation's most populous counties, this article shows a strong and statistically significant correlation between compensatory and punitive damages. These findings are replicated in 25 years of punitive damages awards from Cook County, Illinois, and California. In addition, we find no evidence that punitive damages awards are more likely when individuals sue businesses than when individuals sue individuals. With respect to award frequency, juries rarely award punitive damages and appear to be especially reluctant to do so in the areas of law that have captured the most attention, products liability …
The Cathedral At Twenty-Five: Citations And Impressions, James E. Krier, Stewart J. Schwab
The Cathedral At Twenty-Five: Citations And Impressions, James E. Krier, Stewart J. Schwab
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
It was twenty-five years ago that Guido Calabresi and Douglas Melamed published their article on property rules, liability rules, and inalienability. Calabresi, then a law professor, later a dean, is now a federal judge. Melamed, formerly a student of Calabresi's, is now a seasoned Washington attorney. Their article—which, thanks to its subtitle, we shall call The Cathedral—has had a remarkable influence on our own thinking, as we tried to show in a recent paper.
This is not the place to rehash what we said then, but a summary might be in order. First, we demonstrated that the conventional wisdom …
Why Civil Cases Go To Trial: Strategic Bargaining And The Desire For Vindication, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Why Civil Cases Go To Trial: Strategic Bargaining And The Desire For Vindication, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Articles
When negotiations break down and a dispute cannot be settled, attorneys commonly blame their adversaries, often questioning their ethics or their judgment. After interviewing many attorneys, we have come to believe much of the criticism is directed at strategic moves in negotiation. But strategic ploys are not the only reason dispute resolution fails. Rather, our research also suggest that a genuine desire for vindication through trial or other formal process may be very significant in some types of cases where bargaining breaks down.
Going To Trial: A Rare Throw Of The Die, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Going To Trial: A Rare Throw Of The Die, Samuel R. Gross, Kent D. Syverud
Articles
If it is true, as we often hear, that we are one of the most litigious societies on earth, it is because of our propensity to sue, not our affinity for trials. Of the hundreds of thousands of civil lawsuits that are filed each year in America, the great majority are settled; of those that are not settled, most are ultimately dismissed by the plaintiffs or by the courts; only a few percent are tried to a jury or a judge. This is no accident. We prefer settlements and have designed a system of civil justice that embodies and expresses …