Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appeal costs (1)
- Argument (1)
- Binary decision (1)
- Campaign finance laws (1)
- Chief Justice Roberts (1)
-
- Citron (1)
- Congressional committees (1)
- Congressional subpoenas (1)
- Conservative legal principles (1)
- Court’s institutional legitimacy (1)
- Divided political landscape (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Election in November 2020 (1)
- Financial records (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Justice (1)
- Justice Alito (1)
- Justice Gorsuch (1)
- Justice Sotomayor (1)
- LLP (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Lower court decisions (1)
- Lower courts (1)
- Middle ground (1)
- New York District Attorney (1)
- Political divisions magnified (1)
- Presidency (1)
- Pretrial settlement (1)
- Remanding (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Rethinking Appeals, Uri Weiss
Rethinking Appeals, Uri Weiss
Touro Law Review
This paper makes the point that a court decision that is open to an appeal is akin to a take-it-or-leave-it settlement proposal for both parties. For the case to not be appealed, both parties need to “take,” i.e., accept, this proposal. Thus, on one hand, if both parties cannot achieve a settlement by themselves, they usually benefit from the right to appeal. On the other hand, a right to appeal activates the regressive effects that characterize settlements, which also applies to lower-court decisions. For example, legal uncertainty has a regressive effect on lower-court decisions: if the judge wishes to block …
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.