Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- "Beverly Hills Hotel" (1)
- "Hush money" (1)
- "National Enquirer" (1)
- "Stormy Daniels" (1)
- Article commentary (1)
-
- Businessman (1)
- Cohen (1)
- Collusion (1)
- Comey (1)
- Conduct (1)
- Courtroom (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Defamation (1)
- Deposition (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Documents (1)
- Evidence (1)
- FBI (1)
- Federal Criminal Law (1)
- Francis Shen (1)
- Investigation (1)
- Justice (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal context (1)
- Libel (1)
- Litigators (1)
- Media (1)
- Mens rea (1)
- Mueller (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Discovering Trump 06-22-2018, David A. Logan
Rwu First Amendment Blog: David Logan's Blog: Discovering Trump 06-22-2018, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
The Difficulty Of Discerning The Effect Of Neuroscience: A Peer Commentary Of Shen Et Al. 2018, John B. Meixner Jr.
The Difficulty Of Discerning The Effect Of Neuroscience: A Peer Commentary Of Shen Et Al. 2018, John B. Meixner Jr.
Scholarly Works
Neuroscience is often considered to have a certain ‘seductive allure’.1 Its mystique should not besurprising. Seeking to understand the network of nearly 100 billion neurons that make up the human brain, neuroscience examines some of the most difficult questions imaginable. And yet, it is also a deeply personal discipline—questions like, ‘How do we create memories?’ and ‘What causes emotions?’ touch on experiences shared by all people.
Does the mystique of neuroscience cause individuals to ascribe undue weight to neuroscientific findings, or assume that neuroimages indicate research quality? Over the past decade, a literature has sprung up seeking to answer questions …
Public Defense Litigation: An Overview, Lauren Sudeall Lucas
Public Defense Litigation: An Overview, Lauren Sudeall Lucas
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
"Innocence" And The Guilty Mind, Stephen F. Smith
"Innocence" And The Guilty Mind, Stephen F. Smith
Journal Articles
For decades, the “guilty mind” requirement in federal criminal law has been understood as precluding punishment for “morally blameless” (or “innocent”) conduct, the goal being to define the mental element in terms that will protect offenders from conviction unless they had adequate notice of the wrongfulness of their conduct. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Elonis v. United States signals a significant shift in mens readoctrine, recognizing for the first time the potential for disproportionately severe punishment as a justification for heightened mens rea requirements. This long-overdue doctrinal move makes perfect sense because punishment without culpability and excessive punishment …
The Office Of The Prosecutor: Seeking Justice Or Serving Global Imperialism?, Shannon Fyfe
The Office Of The Prosecutor: Seeking Justice Or Serving Global Imperialism?, Shannon Fyfe
Scholarly Articles
The international criminal courts and tribunals, especially the ICC, have been strongly criticized for their susceptibility to political influence. Some have argued that the ICC has a distinctly Western bias and is participating in a new kind of imperialism in Africa. Others argue that history and the complicity of the West should disqualify the international community from demanding the prosecution of individuals participating in conflicts resulting directly from colonialism. Many have focused on the nature of the creation of the judicial bodies and the inherent political nature of judicial decisions regarding whom to prosecute. In this article, I offer a …