Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Abortion clinics (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Carmichael (1)
-
- Criminal defense lawyers (1)
- Daubert hearing (1)
- Daubert test (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 11 (1)
- Federal court (1)
- Federal rules of evidence (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- Kumho tire (1)
- Legal ethics (1)
- National Organization of Women (1)
- Professional ethics (1)
- Prosecution--Decision making (1)
- RICO (1)
- Reliability (1)
- Science (1)
- Scientific community (1)
- Scientific evidence (1)
- Scientific expert testimony (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Testability (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Litigation
Disarray Among The Federal Circuits: Harmless Error Review Of Rule 11 Violations, Brent E. Newton
Disarray Among The Federal Circuits: Harmless Error Review Of Rule 11 Violations, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 governs how a defendant must be counseled when pleading guilty or nolo contendre. Federal Courts of Appeals have held that violation of Rule 11 is harmless error. Since it is harmless error, the lower courts’ decisions are upheld. This article argues that the Federal Courts of Appeals have misapplied the harmless error standard when deciding Rule 11 issues.
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Now V. Scheidler, Round Two, Craig M. Bradley
Now V. Scheidler, Round Two, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Litigators’ Ethics, Michael E. Tigar