Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Case studies (1)
- Chevron USA Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council Inc. (1)
- Chevron deference (1)
- Congress (1)
- Detention (1)
-
- Emergenices (1)
- Federal agencies (1)
- Freedom (1)
- India (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- National Security Act (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Preventive detention (1)
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co. (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Standards of review (1)
- United States Trade Representative (1)
- Uruguay Round (1)
- Uruguay Round Agreements Act (1)
- World Trade Organization (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Interpreting Urugual Round Agreements Act Section 102(B)'S Safeguards For State Sovereignty: Reconciling Judicial Independence With The United States Trade Representative's Policy Expertise, Brandon Johnson
Michigan Journal of International Law
In this Note, I address the concerns of one aspect of this academic commentary-the claim that the WTO Agreement may cause a tectonic shift in domestic regulatory power, away from the states and toward the federal government and/or the WTO. I argue that while the concerns about the loss of national sovereignty are exaggerated, there is a very real threat to the sovereignty of the States. Congress was aware of this danger and included a variety of provisions designed specifically to protect state sovereignty from federal encroachment in the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), the federal legislation incorporating the WTO …
The Anatomy Of An Institutionalized Emergency: Preventive Detention And Personal Liberty In India, Derek P. Jinks
The Anatomy Of An Institutionalized Emergency: Preventive Detention And Personal Liberty In India, Derek P. Jinks
Michigan Journal of International Law
Despite many indications of an emerging transnational consensus on the scope of human rights law, fundamental disagreements persist. These disagreements are, in many respects, structured around important cleavages in the international community such as: North/South, East/West, and capitalist/socialist. Whether these cleavages are understood as cultural, economic, or political, international lawyers must develop a better understanding of the specific practices that generate divergent interpretations of human rights standards. Without such an understanding, these factions seem to underscore an irreducibly political conception of human rights. Indeed, the prospects of a global "community of law" turn on the degree to which fundamental differences …