Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Antioch Law Journal (2)
- Atomic Veterans (1)
- Civil RICO (1)
- Employment Discrimination (1)
- Energy Reorganization Act (1)
-
- Federal and State Whistleblower Protections. (1)
- Nuclear Whistleblower Protection (1)
- Organized Crime (1)
- Organized Crime Control Act (1)
- Protected Activity (1)
- Veterans Administation (1)
- Veterans' Administration Adjudication Procedure and Judicial Review Act (1)
- Whistleblower Law (1)
- Whistleblower Protections (1)
- White Collar Crimes (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Civil Rico Under Fire: Will White Collar Criminals Be Exempted?, Mark P. Cohen
Civil Rico Under Fire: Will White Collar Criminals Be Exempted?, Mark P. Cohen
Antioch Law Journal
On October 3, 1985, representatives of a coalition of over twenty public interest and consumer groups' marched in front of the Washington, D.C. law offices of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 2 holding aloft a banner reading "Corporate Criminals Must Pay" and chanting "Put your clients away, let RICO stay." Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering was singled out as the spearhead of the business lobby seeking, in the coalition's view, to vitiate the effective civil provisions of the "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act" ("RICO"),3 in particular, its treble damage remedy. The goal of RICO, set out in the "Statement of Findings …
Nuclear Whistleblower Protection And The Scope Of Protected Activity Under Section 210 Of The Energy Reorganization Act, Stephen M. Kohn, Thomas Carpenter
Nuclear Whistleblower Protection And The Scope Of Protected Activity Under Section 210 Of The Energy Reorganization Act, Stephen M. Kohn, Thomas Carpenter
Antioch Law Journal
In 1978 Congress amended the Energy Reorganization Act in order to protect whistleblowers - employees who disclose potential violations of nuclear health and safety laws - from retaliation by their employers. 1 Since passage of the nuclear whistleblower protection amendment, the circuit courts of appeals are divided over the issue of what constitutes protected activity.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in 1984 that an employee must contact a "competent organ of government" to be protected. 2 The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits have disagreed, and have held that employees who disclose …
An Overview Of Federal And State Whistleblower Protections, Stephen M. Kohn, Michael D. Kohn
An Overview Of Federal And State Whistleblower Protections, Stephen M. Kohn, Michael D. Kohn
Antioch Law Journal
The protection of employee whistleblowers is a controversial and developing area within employment discrimination law. There is no comprehensive law which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who disclose potential corporate or governmental violations of law, or practices which may violate environmental standards or threaten the health and safety of employees and the public. Instead, over the past twenty-five years there has been a steady growth in common law and specific statutory protections for employee whistleblowers. This article is an introduction to the major statutory and common law provisions which concern whistleblower protection. It is not intended to present a …
Hope For Atomic Vets: The Proposed Veterans' Administration Adjudication Procedure And Judicial Review Act, Karen Lee Hochstein
Hope For Atomic Vets: The Proposed Veterans' Administration Adjudication Procedure And Judicial Review Act, Karen Lee Hochstein
Antioch Law Journal
This Comment will discuss the judicial review'3 and rulemaking14 provisions of the bill and their possible impact on efforts by atomic veterans to obtain benefits from the Veterans Administration. Part II will provide an overview of the Veterans Administration's claims procedures, describing the criteria currently applied to claims of atomic veterans and the changes contained in the bill. Part III will discuss the critical sections of the bill, including the unique standard of review'5 for factual determinations made in adjudicating individual claims for benefits. In particular, Part III will discuss potential problems posed to reviewing courts applying the standard of …