Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (5)
- Gender and Sexuality (5)
- Law and Gender (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Law and Society (5)
-
- Politics and Social Change (5)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (5)
- Social Work (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Sociology (5)
- Civic and Community Engagement (4)
- Criminology (4)
- Inequality and Stratification (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Sexuality and the Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Community-Based Research (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Sociology of Religion (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
The Citizens Were Heard, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
The Citizens Were Heard, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Donna M. Hughes
Speak Your Voice On Prostitution Bill, Donna L. Landry, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Speak Your Voice On Prostitution Bill, Donna L. Landry, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Donna M. Hughes
The Obstructionism Of Senator Paul Jabour, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
The Obstructionism Of Senator Paul Jabour, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Donna M. Hughes
Action Alert For Senate: Comments On Human Trafficking Bills, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Action Alert For Senate: Comments On Human Trafficking Bills, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Donna M. Hughes
Testimony On Human Trafficking Bill, Rhode Island Senate Judiciary Committee, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Testimony On Human Trafficking Bill, Rhode Island Senate Judiciary Committee, Donna M. Hughes Dr.
Donna M. Hughes
Legislative Supremacy In The United States?: Rethinking The Enrolled Bill Doctrine, Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov
Legislative Supremacy In The United States?: Rethinking The Enrolled Bill Doctrine, Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov
Dr. Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov
This Article revisits the “enrolled bill” doctrine which requires courts to accept the signatures of the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate on the “enrolled bill” as unimpeachable evidence that a bill has been constitutionally enacted. It argues that this time-honored doctrine has far-reaching ramifications that were largely overlooked in existing discussions. In addition to reexamining the soundness of this doctrine’s main rationales, the Article introduces two major novel arguments against the doctrine. First, it argues that the doctrine amounts to an impermissible delegation of both judicial and lawmaking powers to the legislative officers of Congress. Second, …