Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Unpublished opinions (8)
- Legal citations (4)
- Appellate courts (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Legal publishing (3)
-
- Opinions (2)
- Precedents (2)
- Academic law (1)
- Agency (1)
- Common law (1)
- Constitutional theory (1)
- Court rules (1)
- Deference (1)
- Dissenting opinions (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Judges/Accountability (1)
- Judicial decisionmaking (1)
- Judicial decisions (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Minimalism (1)
- No-citation rules (1)
- Nonlegislative rule (1)
- Public defenders (1)
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) (1)
- Rehnquist (William) (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Sunstein (Cass) (1)
- Theory of knowledge (1)
- United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
Take A Letter, Your Honor: Outing The Judicial Epistemology Of Hart V. Massanari, Penelope Pether
Take A Letter, Your Honor: Outing The Judicial Epistemology Of Hart V. Massanari, Penelope Pether
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl Tobias
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl Tobias
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parades Of Horribles, Circles Of Hell: Ethical Dimensions Of The Publication Controversy, David S. Caudill
Parades Of Horribles, Circles Of Hell: Ethical Dimensions Of The Publication Controversy, David S. Caudill
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About The Tip Of An Iceberg, William M. Richman
Much Ado About The Tip Of An Iceberg, William M. Richman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About Little: Explaining The Sturm Und Drang Over The Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Patrick J. Schiltz
Much Ado About Little: Explaining The Sturm Und Drang Over The Citation Of Unpublished Opinions, Patrick J. Schiltz
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dog That Did Not Bark: No-Citation Rules, Judicial Conference Rulemaking, And Federal Public Defenders, Stephen R. Barnett
The Dog That Did Not Bark: No-Citation Rules, Judicial Conference Rulemaking, And Federal Public Defenders, Stephen R. Barnett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commentary: Unpublication And The Judicial Concept Of Audience, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Commentary: Unpublication And The Judicial Concept Of Audience, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Publishing Dissent, Arthur J. Jacobson
Publishing Dissent, Arthur J. Jacobson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judges As Trustees: A Duty To Account And An Opportunity For Virtue, Sarah M. R. Cravens
Judges As Trustees: A Duty To Account And An Opportunity For Virtue, Sarah M. R. Cravens
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Unspoken Questions In The Rule 32.1 Debate: Precedent And Psychology In Judging, David E. Klein
Unspoken Questions In The Rule 32.1 Debate: Precedent And Psychology In Judging, David E. Klein
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, David C. Vladeck, Mitu Gulati
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, David C. Vladeck, Mitu Gulati
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel
A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel
Michigan Law Review
According to the prevailing wisdom in academic public law, constitutional theory is a field that seeks to articulate and evaluate abstract accounts of the nature of the United States Constitution. Theorists offer those accounts as guides to subsequent judicial construction of constitutional provisions. As typically conceived, therefore, constitutional theory tends to proceed analytically from the general to the particular; its animating idea is that correct decisions in constitutional cases presuppose theoretical commitments to the methodological principles that should guide constitutional interpretation and the substantive values such interpretation should advance. In its enthusiasm for abstraction, constitutional theory has, at times, generated …
Kruse V. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Decided September 10, 2004), Jennifer Katehos
Kruse V. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Decided September 10, 2004), Jennifer Katehos
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.