Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Amicus brief (1)
- Appellate brief writing (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Citation (1)
-
- Citation Practices (1)
- Citing (1)
- Constitutionalism (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Law Journals (1)
- Legal Periodicals (1)
- Legal academia (1)
- Liberal scholarship (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Social value (1)
- State right (1)
- Statutory right (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (1)
- Tushnet (Mark) (1)
- Welfare (1)
- Word processing programs (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
The Citing Of Law Reviews By The Supreme Court:1971-1999, Louis J. Sirico Jr.
The Citing Of Law Reviews By The Supreme Court:1971-1999, Louis J. Sirico Jr.
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Foreword: The Question Of Process, J. Harvie Wilkinson Iii
Michigan Law Review
Many in the legal profession have abandoned the great questions of legal process. This is too bad. How a decision is reached can be as important as what the decision is. In an increasingly diverse country with many competing visions of the good, it is critical for law to aspire to agreement on process - a task both more achievable than agreement on substance and more suited to our profession than waving the banners of ideological truth. By process, I mean the institutional routes by which we in America reach our most crucial decisions. In other words, process is our …
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Michigan Law Review
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and constitutional judicial review really can make a difference. Gerald Rosenberg, for example, in The Hollow Hope, expressly questions whether judicial review achieves effective social change. Similarly, Michael Klarman explores whether the Supreme Court's desegregation decisions were effective, except insofar as they produced a right-wing backlash that induced action to desegregate. In Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Mark Tushnet approvingly invokes these arguments (pp. 137, 145), but he goes much further. Professor Tushnet contends that, on balance, constitutional judicial review is harmful. He …
A (Microsoft) Word To The Wise – Beware Of Footnotes And Gray Areas: The Seventh Circuit Continues To Count Words, Clifford S. Zimmerman
A (Microsoft) Word To The Wise – Beware Of Footnotes And Gray Areas: The Seventh Circuit Continues To Count Words, Clifford S. Zimmerman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure limit the length of a written brief. This article examines the limits in place and addresses a Seventh Circuit decision involving such limits.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.