Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Black Law Student Association (3)
- Black Law Students (3)
- Black Laywers (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- Symposium (3)
-
- Article III (1)
- Black Law Deans (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional departmentalism (1)
- Constitutional departmentalists (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Constitutional interpretive authority (1)
- Curating content (1)
- Digital age (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- Facebook (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Free speech principles (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Human freedom (1)
- International human rights law (1)
- John locke (1)
- Judicial branch (1)
- Judicial independence (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Judicial supremacists (1)
- Legislative branch (1)
- Platforms (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
Taking Exception To Assessments Of American Exceptionalism: Why The United States Isn’T Such An Outlier On Free Speech, Evelyn Mary Aswad
Taking Exception To Assessments Of American Exceptionalism: Why The United States Isn’T Such An Outlier On Free Speech, Evelyn Mary Aswad
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
One of the most significant challenges to human freedom in the digital age involves the sheer power of private companies over speech and the fact that power is untethered to existing free speech principles. Heated debates are ongoing about what standards social media companies should adopt to regulate speech on their platforms. Some have argued that global social media companies, such as Facebook and Twitter, should align their speech codes with the international human rights law standards of the United Nations (“U.N.”). Others have countered that U.S.-based companies should apply First Amendment standards. Much of this debate is premised on …
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
The People's Court: On The Intellectual Origins Of American Judicial Power, Ian C. Bartrum
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This article enters into the modern debate between “consti- tutional departmentalists”—who contend that the executive and legislative branches share constitutional interpretive authority with the courts—and what are sometimes called “judicial supremacists.” After exploring the relevant history of political ideas, I join the modern minority of voices in the latter camp.
This is an intellectual history of two evolving political ideas—popular sovereignty and the separation of powers—which merged in the making of American judicial power, and I argue we can only understand the structural function of judicial review by bringing these ideas together into an integrated whole. Or, put another way, …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Foreword, Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Introductory Remarks, Michael Rogers, Hannah Hamley, Rayshaun D. Williams
Seattle University Law Review
Introductory Remarks.
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
Seattle University Law Review
The Deans' Roundtable.