Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND TAXATION (2)
- AT&T (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Cadenas de Suministro (1)
-
- Convenios de Doble Imposición (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Incoterms (1)
- Interoperability (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Jurisdiction retention (1)
- Liability (1)
- Licenses (1)
- Microsoft (1)
- Monopolies (1)
- Negocios Internacionales (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- Rate setting (1)
- Regalías (1)
- Reglas de Origen (1)
- TESCM (1)
- Tratado Bilateral de Protección de Inversiones (1)
- Tratados de Libre Comercio (1)
- Valoración Aduanera (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
La Tributación En Los Negocios Internacionales, Juan David Barbosa
La Tributación En Los Negocios Internacionales, Juan David Barbosa
Juan David Barbosa Mariño
El presente escrito analiza, desde la perspectiva de la normatividad colombiana y del derecho tributario internacional, algunos de los aspectos mas importantes que deben ser considerados al estructurar o determinar los efectos tributarios de un negocio internacional. El análisis presenta las implicaciones fiscales que pueden tener la negociación de los distintos Incoterms; así como algunos de los efectos en materia de IVA que pueden tener las normas de origen y las normas de valoración aduanera. También señala algunos efectos de la aplicación de tratados internacionales para los negocios internacionales, particularmente los Convenios para evitar la Doble Imposición – de aquí …
Las Salvaguardias Dentro De Los Tratados De Libre Comercio, Juan David Barbosa
Las Salvaguardias Dentro De Los Tratados De Libre Comercio, Juan David Barbosa
Juan David Barbosa Mariño
Presentación realizada en desarrollo de la expedición del Decreto 1820 de 2010 que consagra el nuevo regimen de Salvaguardias dentro de los Tratados de Libre Comercio.
Post-Litigation Enforcement Of Remedial Orders Issued By The U.S. International Trade Commission In Section 337 Investigations, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 248 (2009), Merritt R. Blakeslee
Post-Litigation Enforcement Of Remedial Orders Issued By The U.S. International Trade Commission In Section 337 Investigations, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 248 (2009), Merritt R. Blakeslee
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
There is a common misperception that enforcement of International Trade Commission (“ITC”) remedial orders is automatic and self implementing. In reality, such remedial orders are not self-implementing, are less-than-perfect enforcement tools, and their effective enforcement carries with it a number of practical difficulties. This paper explores the realities of enforcing the ITC’s remedial orders – exclusion orders, consent orders, and cease-and-desist orders – with the goal of giving both complainants and respondents a heightened appreciation of the tactics and strategies that can be effectively deployed following the conclusion of a Section 337 investigation and the issuance of one or more …
Regulating Interoperability: Lessons From At&T, Microsoft, And Beyond, Philip J. Weiser
Regulating Interoperability: Lessons From At&T, Microsoft, And Beyond, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
Antitrust law confronted the challenges of regulating interoperability between platforms and applications in both the AT&T and Microsoft cases, but it has yet to mine the series of lessons that can inform how to address this challenge going forward. With the Microsoft consent decree still in place, it may too soon to render a final judgment on the remedy adopted in that case as well as to evaluate more generally whether antitrust law is up to the task of developing the institutional strategies - be it the use of technical committees or reliance on standard setting bodies - for addressing …
Bargaining In The Shadow Of Rate-Setting Courts, Daniel A. Crane
Bargaining In The Shadow Of Rate-Setting Courts, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Judges will tell you that they are comparatively poor rate regulators. The specialized, technical competence and supervisory capacity that public utilities commissions enjoy are usually absent from judicial chambers. Nonetheless, when granting antitrust remedies-particularly remedies for monopolistic abuse of intellectual property-courts sometimes purport to act as rate regulators for the licensing or sale of the defendant's assets. At the outset, we should distinguish between two forms ofjudicial rate setting. In one form, a court (or the FTC in its adjudicative capacity) grants a compulsory license and sets a specific rate as part of a final judgment or an order. The …