Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Artisan lien (1)
- Civil consent judgment (1)
- Civil law (1)
- Civil remedy (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
-
- Credit (1)
- Guilty plea (1)
- Maintenance requirement (1)
- Margin requirement (1)
- Maximum loan value (1)
- New York Stock Exchange Rule 431 (1)
- Prima facie (1)
- Purchase (1)
- Recovery (1)
- Regulation T (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Section 5(a) (1)
- Section 7 (1)
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Subscription right (1)
- Treble damage (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Antitrust-Clayton Act-Admissibilty Of Criminal Conviction Entered On A Plea Of Guilty As Prima Facie Evidence In Civil Suit For Treble Damage, Arthur M. Sherwood
Antitrust-Clayton Act-Admissibilty Of Criminal Conviction Entered On A Plea Of Guilty As Prima Facie Evidence In Civil Suit For Treble Damage, Arthur M. Sherwood
Michigan Law Review
In a civil action for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, the plaintiff sought to allege as prima facie evidence of a Sherman Act violation a criminal conviction entered on a plea of guilty by the defendant in an earlier prosecution by the government. The trial court sustained a motion by the defendant to strike from plaintiff's complaint any reference to the criminal prosecution. On appeal, held, reversed, one judge dissenting. A judgment entered on a plea of guilty is not a consent judgment within the meaning of the proviso to section 5(a) of the Clayton …
Enhancement Of Value As Element Of Artisan's Lien
Enhancement Of Value As Element Of Artisan's Lien
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Cml Remedies Based Upon Illegal Extension Of Credit In Violation Of Regulation T, Robert G. Lane
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Cml Remedies Based Upon Illegal Extension Of Credit In Violation Of Regulation T, Robert G. Lane
Michigan Law Review
Following the stock market crash of 1929, there was considerable agitation for the regulation, and even the elimination, of the purchasing of securities on credit. Indeed, the extension of credit for the purchasing of securities became an issue in the 1932 presidential campaign and finally, in 1934, came under direct federal control. Although the federal regulations were intended to eliminate the hazards associated with the extension of credit for the purchasing of securities, all the available evidence indicates that the substantial amount of credit in the stock market was a significant factor in pushing up prices during the bull market, …