Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Attorney-client privilege (1)
- Attorneys (1)
- Client (1)
-
- Criminal investigation (1)
- Defense attorney (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Education (1)
- Employment Law (1)
- Equal justice (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Geography (1)
- Grand jury (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- History (1)
- Indictment (1)
- Indigents (1)
- Law (1)
- Lawyer (1)
- Legal profession (1)
- Legal services to the poor (1)
- Physicians (1)
- Pro bono (1)
- Public access doctrine (1)
- Public and closed trials (1)
- Right of access (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
Academic Freedom And Professorial Speech In The Post-Garcetti World, Oren R. Griffin
Academic Freedom And Professorial Speech In The Post-Garcetti World, Oren R. Griffin
Seattle University Law Review
Academic freedom, a coveted feature of higher education, is the concept that faculty should be free to perform their essential functions as professors and scholars without the threat of retaliation or undue administrative influence. The central mission of an academic institution, teach-ing and research, is well served by academic freedom that allows the faculty to conduct its work in the absence of censorship or coercion. In support of this proposition, courts have long held that academic freedom is a special concern of the First Amendment, granting professors and faculty members cherished protections regarding academic speech. In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the …
Public Access To Physician And Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings, Michael Spake
Public Access To Physician And Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings, Michael Spake
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Two Faces Of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) In Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago, Nelson Lund
Two Faces Of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) In Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago, Nelson Lund
Florida Law Review
Since the days of the Warren Court, conservatives have attacked “judicial activism.” Beginning with Judge Robert Bork’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, and lately with increasing frequency, liberals have sought to turn the tables. Critics now charge that conservative judges are activists, especially when they undermine liberal precedents or strike down liberal legislation. Defenders of judicial activism have all but disappeared. One sign of this apparent consensus is that all Supreme Court nominees now promise to be paragons of judicial restraint. Any of the following quotes, for example, could easily have been uttered by any of the four most recent nominees: …
The Grand Jury Subpoena: Is It The Prosecutor's "Ultimate Weapon" Against Defense Attorneys And Their Clients?, Tara A. Flanagan
The Grand Jury Subpoena: Is It The Prosecutor's "Ultimate Weapon" Against Defense Attorneys And Their Clients?, Tara A. Flanagan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comment On The Instruction Of Constitutional Law, William H. Rehnquist
A Comment On The Instruction Of Constitutional Law, William H. Rehnquist
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mandatory Pro Bono: The Path To Equal Justice, John R. Desteiguer
Mandatory Pro Bono: The Path To Equal Justice, John R. Desteiguer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.