Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adversarial proceeding (1)
- Battle of the experts (1)
- Civil litigation (1)
- Conflict of interest (1)
- Disqualification doctrine (1)
-
- Disqualification test (1)
- Expert disqualification (1)
- Expert testimony (1)
- Expert witness disqualification (1)
- Expert witnesses (1)
- Experts (1)
- Financial regulation; Compliance technology; Cybersecurity; Agency problems; Risk analysis; Financial accidents; Systemic risks; “Too linked to fail”; “Too fast to save”; Hackers; Cybercriminals; Corporate governance; Risk management; Human agency; Artificial intelligence (1)
- Inherent authority (1)
- Inherent judicial authority (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
Compliance, Technology, And Modern Finance, Tom C.W. Lin
Compliance, Technology, And Modern Finance, Tom C.W. Lin
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
An important transformation is happening in the financial industry. The rise of new technology and compliance has dramatically altered many of the key functions and functionaries of modern finance. Artificial intelligence, algorithmic programs, and supercomputers, instead of human actors, now constitute the core of many financial operations. Compliance officers have become just as critical to financial institutions as traders, bankers, and analysts. Finance as we knew it has changed and continues to change. This symposium Article offers a studied commentary on these unfolding changes, the crosscutting developments in compliance, technology, and modern finance. It examines the concurrent and intersecting ascents …
New Rules Of War In The Battle Of The Experts: Amending The Expert Witness Disqualification Test For Conflicts Of Interest, Nina A. Vershuta
New Rules Of War In The Battle Of The Experts: Amending The Expert Witness Disqualification Test For Conflicts Of Interest, Nina A. Vershuta
Brooklyn Law Review
In civil litigation, the big business of retaining experts has raised concerns about the integrity of the adversarial process and undermined the role that expert testimony plays at trial. Due to a rising demand for expert testimony, it is common for the same expert to testify for opposing clients. When a client hires an expert who has been previously retained by that client’s adversary, a conflict of interest arises. Such experts may share confidential information with their new client to the detriment of the former client—triggering the expert disqualification test for conflicts of interest. Most state and federal courts do …