Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adversarial and inquisitorial process (1)
- Alford plea (1)
- Allocution (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Barriers to access (1)
-
- Blending in (1)
- Collective benefits of disclosure (1)
- Colloquy (1)
- Conviction rates (1)
- Criminal defense (1)
- Criminal justice policy (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Disability identity (1)
- Disclosure and marginalized identity (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Hiding disability (1)
- Holistic representation (1)
- Indigent defense (1)
- Invisible disabilities (1)
- Job prospects (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legal aid (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Legitimacy (1)
- Peer acceptance (1)
- Procedural justice (1)
- Prosecutors (1)
- Public defenders (1)
- Recidivism (1)
- Sentencing (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
Debating Disability Disclosure In Legal Education, Jasmine E. Harris
Debating Disability Disclosure In Legal Education, Jasmine E. Harris
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Effects Of Holistic Defense On Criminal Justice Outcomes, James Anderson, Maya Buenaventura, Paul Heaton
The Effects Of Holistic Defense On Criminal Justice Outcomes, James Anderson, Maya Buenaventura, Paul Heaton
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Designing Plea Bargaining From The Ground Up: Accuracy And Fairness Without Trials As Backstops, Stephanos Bibas
Designing Plea Bargaining From The Ground Up: Accuracy And Fairness Without Trials As Backstops, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
American criminal procedure developed on the assumption that grand juries and petit jury trials were the ultimate safeguards of fair procedures and accurate outcomes. But now that plea bargaining has all but supplanted juries, we need to think through what safeguards our plea-bargaining system should be built around. This Symposium Article sketches out principles for redesigning our plea-bargaining system from the ground up around safeguards. Part I explores the causes of factual, moral, and legal inaccuracies in guilty pleas. To prevent and remedy these inaccuracies, it proposes a combination of quasi-inquisitorial safeguards, more vigorous criminal defense, and better normative evaluation …