Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 2006 (1)
- 8th amendment (1)
- AEDPA (1)
- Abdul Kabir (1)
- Abdul-Kabir (1)
-
- Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman (1)
- Aggravating factors (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Appellate Court (1)
- Brewer (1)
- Brewer v. Quarterman (1)
- Capital cases (1)
- Capital punishment cases (1)
- Competence of defendant (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Death penalty jurisprudence (1)
- Death qualified jurors (1)
- Death qualified jury (1)
- Discretionary Review (1)
- Eighth amendment (1)
- Elimination of a juror (1)
- Exclusion of a jury (1)
- Ford v. Wainwright (1)
- Harmless error (1)
- Incompetence of defense counsel (1)
- Instructions to jury (1)
- Interlocutory Review (1)
- Jury selection (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
The Confusing Standards For Discretionary Review In Washington And A Proposed Framework For Clarity, Judge Stephen Dwyer
The Confusing Standards For Discretionary Review In Washington And A Proposed Framework For Clarity, Judge Stephen Dwyer
Seattle University Law Review
It has now been more than thirty-five years since the Washington Rules of Appellate Procedure (RAP) became effective in 1976 and replaced all prior rules governing appellate procedure. One significant change that those rules made was to clearly describe and delineate a procedural mechanism for seeking interlocutory review of trial court decisions. The ultimate effect on practitioners is both obvious and unavoidable. Many lawyers, rather than stake out a clear position regarding the applicability of the various considerations governing discretionary review, simply argue that any and every consideration that is even arguably applicable is satisfied by the trial court’s determination. …
53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series, The Hon. Justice John Paul Stevens
53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series, The Hon. Justice John Paul Stevens
Georgia State University Law Review
Remarks by the Honorable John Paul Stevens, Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the 53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series.
An Analysis Of Death Penalty Decisions From The October 2006 Supreme Court Term, Richard Klein
An Analysis Of Death Penalty Decisions From The October 2006 Supreme Court Term, Richard Klein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Undersigned Attorney Hereby Certifies: Ensuring Reasonable Caseloads For Washington Defenders And Clients, Andrea Woods
The Undersigned Attorney Hereby Certifies: Ensuring Reasonable Caseloads For Washington Defenders And Clients, Andrea Woods
Washington Law Review
The Standards governing Washington’s public defenders represent a significant reform aimed at protecting an important constitutional right for our state’s vulnerable citizens. This Comment provides the necessary introduction to the Standards and addresses skepticism on the part of current practitioners and elected officials. Cooperation among defense attorneys, local governments, and the courts could ensure the Standards’ success and—in turn—a better system of public defense for attorneys and defendants alike. Part I of this Comment introduces the reader to the new Standards. Part II offers an overview of common critiques of the Washington State Supreme Court Standards that were voiced by …